Power, capability and cultural subjects : an inquiry into “institutional neglect” in participatory planning
Amartya Sen’s capability approach stresses the importance of social choice and moves away from utilitarian reasoning in development studies. Studies in the developing world have shown how reduced capabilities have compromised the effective participation of marginalized communities in participatory d...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/141339 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-141339 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1413392020-06-08T01:36:15Z Power, capability and cultural subjects : an inquiry into “institutional neglect” in participatory planning Nair, Tamara S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Social sciences::Sociology Capabilities Power Amartya Sen’s capability approach stresses the importance of social choice and moves away from utilitarian reasoning in development studies. Studies in the developing world have shown how reduced capabilities have compromised the effective participation of marginalized communities in participatory development. Extending Sen’s capability approach through Foucault’s ideas on power and subject creation, by further literature review, I explore the possibilities of examining the origins of institutional neglect of marginalized communities in Kerala, India. Concepts of normalization and homogenization through the workings of traditional sources of power are put forward as a basis for these communities’ disenfranchisement. From here, I argue that a reassessment of the state’s decentralized development by reviewing cultural contexts surrounding public participation and by adopting a multilevel approach to understanding complex power arrangements, thereby going beyond an economic framing of development, are ways of ensuring effective democratic decentralization. These steps are imperative if development objectives are to be met and sustained. 2020-06-08T01:36:15Z 2020-06-08T01:36:15Z 2018 Journal Article Nair, T. (2018). Power, capability and cultural subjects : an inquiry into “institutional neglect” in participatory planning. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 19(3), 331-344. doi:10.1080/19452829.2018.1484710 1945-2829 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/141339 10.1080/19452829.2018.1484710 2-s2.0-85048977443 3 19 331 344 en Journal of Human Development and Capabilities © 2018 Human Development and Capability Association (Published by Taylor & Francis). All rights reserved. |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Social sciences::Sociology Capabilities Power |
spellingShingle |
Social sciences::Sociology Capabilities Power Nair, Tamara Power, capability and cultural subjects : an inquiry into “institutional neglect” in participatory planning |
description |
Amartya Sen’s capability approach stresses the importance of social choice and moves away from utilitarian reasoning in development studies. Studies in the developing world have shown how reduced capabilities have compromised the effective participation of marginalized communities in participatory development. Extending Sen’s capability approach through Foucault’s ideas on power and subject creation, by further literature review, I explore the possibilities of examining the origins of institutional neglect of marginalized communities in Kerala, India. Concepts of normalization and homogenization through the workings of traditional sources of power are put forward as a basis for these communities’ disenfranchisement. From here, I argue that a reassessment of the state’s decentralized development by reviewing cultural contexts surrounding public participation and by adopting a multilevel approach to understanding complex power arrangements, thereby going beyond an economic framing of development, are ways of ensuring effective democratic decentralization. These steps are imperative if development objectives are to be met and sustained. |
author2 |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies |
author_facet |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Nair, Tamara |
format |
Article |
author |
Nair, Tamara |
author_sort |
Nair, Tamara |
title |
Power, capability and cultural subjects : an inquiry into “institutional neglect” in participatory planning |
title_short |
Power, capability and cultural subjects : an inquiry into “institutional neglect” in participatory planning |
title_full |
Power, capability and cultural subjects : an inquiry into “institutional neglect” in participatory planning |
title_fullStr |
Power, capability and cultural subjects : an inquiry into “institutional neglect” in participatory planning |
title_full_unstemmed |
Power, capability and cultural subjects : an inquiry into “institutional neglect” in participatory planning |
title_sort |
power, capability and cultural subjects : an inquiry into “institutional neglect” in participatory planning |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/141339 |
_version_ |
1681058739415678976 |