Power, capability and cultural subjects : an inquiry into “institutional neglect” in participatory planning

Amartya Sen’s capability approach stresses the importance of social choice and moves away from utilitarian reasoning in development studies. Studies in the developing world have shown how reduced capabilities have compromised the effective participation of marginalized communities in participatory d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nair, Tamara
Other Authors: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/141339
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-141339
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1413392020-06-08T01:36:15Z Power, capability and cultural subjects : an inquiry into “institutional neglect” in participatory planning Nair, Tamara S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Social sciences::Sociology Capabilities Power Amartya Sen’s capability approach stresses the importance of social choice and moves away from utilitarian reasoning in development studies. Studies in the developing world have shown how reduced capabilities have compromised the effective participation of marginalized communities in participatory development. Extending Sen’s capability approach through Foucault’s ideas on power and subject creation, by further literature review, I explore the possibilities of examining the origins of institutional neglect of marginalized communities in Kerala, India. Concepts of normalization and homogenization through the workings of traditional sources of power are put forward as a basis for these communities’ disenfranchisement. From here, I argue that a reassessment of the state’s decentralized development by reviewing cultural contexts surrounding public participation and by adopting a multilevel approach to understanding complex power arrangements, thereby going beyond an economic framing of development, are ways of ensuring effective democratic decentralization. These steps are imperative if development objectives are to be met and sustained. 2020-06-08T01:36:15Z 2020-06-08T01:36:15Z 2018 Journal Article Nair, T. (2018). Power, capability and cultural subjects : an inquiry into “institutional neglect” in participatory planning. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 19(3), 331-344. doi:10.1080/19452829.2018.1484710 1945-2829 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/141339 10.1080/19452829.2018.1484710 2-s2.0-85048977443 3 19 331 344 en Journal of Human Development and Capabilities © 2018 Human Development and Capability Association (Published by Taylor & Francis). All rights reserved.
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social sciences::Sociology
Capabilities
Power
spellingShingle Social sciences::Sociology
Capabilities
Power
Nair, Tamara
Power, capability and cultural subjects : an inquiry into “institutional neglect” in participatory planning
description Amartya Sen’s capability approach stresses the importance of social choice and moves away from utilitarian reasoning in development studies. Studies in the developing world have shown how reduced capabilities have compromised the effective participation of marginalized communities in participatory development. Extending Sen’s capability approach through Foucault’s ideas on power and subject creation, by further literature review, I explore the possibilities of examining the origins of institutional neglect of marginalized communities in Kerala, India. Concepts of normalization and homogenization through the workings of traditional sources of power are put forward as a basis for these communities’ disenfranchisement. From here, I argue that a reassessment of the state’s decentralized development by reviewing cultural contexts surrounding public participation and by adopting a multilevel approach to understanding complex power arrangements, thereby going beyond an economic framing of development, are ways of ensuring effective democratic decentralization. These steps are imperative if development objectives are to be met and sustained.
author2 S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies
author_facet S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies
Nair, Tamara
format Article
author Nair, Tamara
author_sort Nair, Tamara
title Power, capability and cultural subjects : an inquiry into “institutional neglect” in participatory planning
title_short Power, capability and cultural subjects : an inquiry into “institutional neglect” in participatory planning
title_full Power, capability and cultural subjects : an inquiry into “institutional neglect” in participatory planning
title_fullStr Power, capability and cultural subjects : an inquiry into “institutional neglect” in participatory planning
title_full_unstemmed Power, capability and cultural subjects : an inquiry into “institutional neglect” in participatory planning
title_sort power, capability and cultural subjects : an inquiry into “institutional neglect” in participatory planning
publishDate 2020
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/141339
_version_ 1681058739415678976