On the logical necessity of a cultural and cognitive connection for the origin of all aspects of linguistic structure
This chapter presents a view of communication not as coding and decoding, but as ostension and inference, that is, one person doing something to show the intention to communicate, and then another person using abductive inference to infer the reason for the person’s ostensive act, creating a cont...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Book Chapter |
Language: | English |
Published: |
John Benjamins
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145888 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-145888 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1458882021-01-13T06:52:03Z On the logical necessity of a cultural and cognitive connection for the origin of all aspects of linguistic structure LaPolla, Randy J. De Busser, Rik LaPolla, Randy J. School of Humanities Humanities::Linguistics Linguistics Communication This chapter presents a view of communication not as coding and decoding, but as ostension and inference, that is, one person doing something to show the intention to communicate, and then another person using abductive inference to infer the reason for the person’s ostensive act, creating a context of interpretation in which the communicator’s ostensive act “makes sense”, and thereby inferring the communicative and informative intention of the person. Language is not necessary for communication in this view, but develops as speakers use linguistic patterns over and over again to constrain the addressee’s creation of the context of interpretation. Speakers choose which aspects to constrain the interpretation of, and language forms conventionalize from frequent repetition. As constraining the interpretation requires more effort than not constraining it in that way, it must be important to the speakers to constrain that particular aspect of the meaning, otherwise they would not put in the extra effort. Logically, then, the forms that do conventionalize must have been motivated by the cognition and culture of the speakers of the language when they conventionalized, even though over time the motivation is often lost and the form continues to be used only due to convention and habit. 2021-01-13T06:52:03Z 2021-01-13T06:52:03Z 2015 Book Chapter LaPolla, R. J. (2015). On the logical necessity of a cultural and cognitive connection for the origin of all aspects of linguistic structure. In R. De Busser, & R. J. Lapolla. (Eds.), Language Structure and Environment: Social, cultural, and natural factors (pp. 31-44). doi:10.1075/clscc.6.02lap 978-9-02-720409-7 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145888 10.1075/clscc.6.02lap 31 44 en Language Structure and Environment: Social, cultural, and natural factors © 2015 John Benjamins Publishing Company. All rights reserved. John Benjamins |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Humanities::Linguistics Linguistics Communication |
spellingShingle |
Humanities::Linguistics Linguistics Communication LaPolla, Randy J. On the logical necessity of a cultural and cognitive connection for the origin of all aspects of linguistic structure |
description |
This chapter presents a view of communication not as coding and decoding,
but as ostension and inference, that is, one person doing something to show the
intention to communicate, and then another person using abductive inference to
infer the reason for the person’s ostensive act, creating a context of interpretation
in which the communicator’s ostensive act “makes sense”, and thereby inferring
the communicative and informative intention of the person. Language is not
necessary for communication in this view, but develops as speakers use linguistic
patterns over and over again to constrain the addressee’s creation of the context of
interpretation. Speakers choose which aspects to constrain the interpretation of,
and language forms conventionalize from frequent repetition. As constraining the
interpretation requires more effort than not constraining it in that way, it must
be important to the speakers to constrain that particular aspect of the meaning,
otherwise they would not put in the extra effort. Logically, then, the forms that
do conventionalize must have been motivated by the cognition and culture of the
speakers of the language when they conventionalized, even though over time the
motivation is often lost and the form continues to be used only due to convention
and habit. |
author2 |
De Busser, Rik |
author_facet |
De Busser, Rik LaPolla, Randy J. |
format |
Book Chapter |
author |
LaPolla, Randy J. |
author_sort |
LaPolla, Randy J. |
title |
On the logical necessity of a cultural and cognitive connection for the origin of all aspects of linguistic structure |
title_short |
On the logical necessity of a cultural and cognitive connection for the origin of all aspects of linguistic structure |
title_full |
On the logical necessity of a cultural and cognitive connection for the origin of all aspects of linguistic structure |
title_fullStr |
On the logical necessity of a cultural and cognitive connection for the origin of all aspects of linguistic structure |
title_full_unstemmed |
On the logical necessity of a cultural and cognitive connection for the origin of all aspects of linguistic structure |
title_sort |
on the logical necessity of a cultural and cognitive connection for the origin of all aspects of linguistic structure |
publisher |
John Benjamins |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145888 |
_version_ |
1690658446872936448 |