Navigating contradictory logics in the field of luxury retailing

When designing luxury retail experiences, luxury managers are often encouraged to focus on a single logic: the logic of distinction. Evidence suggests, however, that multiple logics influence the field of luxury retailing. In this paper, we explore the implications of such multiplicity, focusing p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Welté, Jean-Baptiste, Cayla, Julien, Fischer, Eileen
Other Authors: Nanyang Business School
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/155782
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-155782
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1557822023-05-19T07:31:18Z Navigating contradictory logics in the field of luxury retailing Welté, Jean-Baptiste Cayla, Julien Fischer, Eileen Nanyang Business School Business::Marketing Customer Experience Institutional Logics When designing luxury retail experiences, luxury managers are often encouraged to focus on a single logic: the logic of distinction. Evidence suggests, however, that multiple logics influence the field of luxury retailing. In this paper, we explore the implications of such multiplicity, focusing particularly on logics coming into tension with one another. Our research questions are: 1) What are the logics that come into conflict in luxury retail settings and 2) How can luxury retail managers navigate conflicts between logics to facilitate positive customer experiences in luxury retail settings? Based on extensive ethnographic fieldwork in the luxury field, we find conflicts mainly between three logics: distinction, pragmatism, and hedonism. We show that each logic is underpinned by different values, different linguistic practices, and different focal objects. We further find that conflicts between the logics tend to become acute during specific interactions during the customer journey. Our findings also suggest that since luxury boutiques are by and large designed to enforce the distinction logic, luxury retailers at times struggle to accommodate and navigate the conflicts that occur between these logics. We identify three interrelated sets of practices, collectively referred to as experiential hybridization, that effectively allow luxury retailers to address the challenge of logic complexity. Theoretically, our research helps illuminate institutional logics as a factor that informs customers’ experiences in contemporary retail fields such as luxury. Managerially, we suggest ways for luxury retailers to manage logic conflict and deliver superior customer experiences. Nanyang Technological University We acknowledge the financial support of Nanyang Technological University in funding data collection for this research. 2022-04-12T05:59:09Z 2022-04-12T05:59:09Z 2021 Journal Article Welté, J., Cayla, J. & Fischer, E. (2021). Navigating contradictory logics in the field of luxury retailing. Journal of Retailing. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2021.11.002 0022-4359 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/155782 10.1016/j.jretai.2021.11.002 en Journal of Retailing © 2021 New York University. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Business::Marketing
Customer Experience
Institutional Logics
spellingShingle Business::Marketing
Customer Experience
Institutional Logics
Welté, Jean-Baptiste
Cayla, Julien
Fischer, Eileen
Navigating contradictory logics in the field of luxury retailing
description When designing luxury retail experiences, luxury managers are often encouraged to focus on a single logic: the logic of distinction. Evidence suggests, however, that multiple logics influence the field of luxury retailing. In this paper, we explore the implications of such multiplicity, focusing particularly on logics coming into tension with one another. Our research questions are: 1) What are the logics that come into conflict in luxury retail settings and 2) How can luxury retail managers navigate conflicts between logics to facilitate positive customer experiences in luxury retail settings? Based on extensive ethnographic fieldwork in the luxury field, we find conflicts mainly between three logics: distinction, pragmatism, and hedonism. We show that each logic is underpinned by different values, different linguistic practices, and different focal objects. We further find that conflicts between the logics tend to become acute during specific interactions during the customer journey. Our findings also suggest that since luxury boutiques are by and large designed to enforce the distinction logic, luxury retailers at times struggle to accommodate and navigate the conflicts that occur between these logics. We identify three interrelated sets of practices, collectively referred to as experiential hybridization, that effectively allow luxury retailers to address the challenge of logic complexity. Theoretically, our research helps illuminate institutional logics as a factor that informs customers’ experiences in contemporary retail fields such as luxury. Managerially, we suggest ways for luxury retailers to manage logic conflict and deliver superior customer experiences.
author2 Nanyang Business School
author_facet Nanyang Business School
Welté, Jean-Baptiste
Cayla, Julien
Fischer, Eileen
format Article
author Welté, Jean-Baptiste
Cayla, Julien
Fischer, Eileen
author_sort Welté, Jean-Baptiste
title Navigating contradictory logics in the field of luxury retailing
title_short Navigating contradictory logics in the field of luxury retailing
title_full Navigating contradictory logics in the field of luxury retailing
title_fullStr Navigating contradictory logics in the field of luxury retailing
title_full_unstemmed Navigating contradictory logics in the field of luxury retailing
title_sort navigating contradictory logics in the field of luxury retailing
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/155782
_version_ 1772828039352156160