Radio-frequency (RF) sensing for deep awareness of human physical status
Radio-frequency has been gaining its popularity over the years due to its ability to transmit data remotely. Radar is the product of radio-frequency and is able to detect an object’s distance and velocity. The radar has many potentials such as detecting vital signs which may be implemented in...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nanyang Technological University
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/157024 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | Radio-frequency has been gaining its popularity over the years due to its ability to
transmit data remotely. Radar is the product of radio-frequency and is able to detect
an object’s distance and velocity. The radar has many potentials such as detecting vital
signs which may be implemented in hospitals for reading patients that are not able to
take a reading through traditional means such as burnt patients. Reading vital signs of
these patients with radar would help as it does not require the equipment to have any
contact with the patient.
The purpose of this project is to apply deep learning on raw data that is produced by
the current hardware which has the purpose of reading human vital signs through the
means of radar. Currently data from this device has reading of interference as well
apart from the actual reading. In this project, models with two different purposes are
proposed to help identify actual reading from interferences and extract respiration rate
from the raw data files that have been produced by the radar. Two models, Convolution
Neural Network and Recurrent Neural Network are used in this project to determine
which model would produce a better result to achieve the purpose of this project.
Different batch sizes along with different dataset and intake size were tested to
determine which configuration is best suited for training.
Although Recurrent Neural Network is better suited for time series data such as radar
data, this is not the case in this project. In the model with the purpose of predicting
actual reading from interference, Convolution Neural Network has performed better
than Recurrent Neural network which is shown with confusion matrix later in the
report. With actual reading being 0.0278% of the whole dataset, Convolution Neural
Network was still able to predict 52% of actual reading correctly. In the model with
the purpose of predicting the respiration rate from a given bin, Convolution Neural
Network has outperformed Recurrent Neural Network with the lowest val loss of 0.738
while Recurrent Neural Network has its lowest val loss at 1.48. |
---|