Risky disciplining: on interdisciplinarity between sociology and cognitive neuroscience in the governing of morality
The neuroscience of morality presents novel approaches in exploring the cognitive and affective underpinnings of moral conduct, and is steadily accumulating influence within discursive frames of biocitizenship. Many claims are infused with varieties of neuro-actuarialism in governing morally risky s...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/160872 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-160872 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1608722022-08-05T01:19:15Z Risky disciplining: on interdisciplinarity between sociology and cognitive neuroscience in the governing of morality Wade, Matthew School of Social Sciences Centre for Liberal Arts and Social Sciences Social sciences::Sociology Biologization Cognitive Neuroscience The neuroscience of morality presents novel approaches in exploring the cognitive and affective underpinnings of moral conduct, and is steadily accumulating influence within discursive frames of biocitizenship. Many claims are infused with varieties of neuro-actuarialism in governing morally risky subjects, with implications that other fields should observe closely. Sociologists and other social scientists, however, have typically been reluctant to interject their expertise. However, a resurgent sociology of morality offers the means by which closer engagement may be realized. In encouraging this interdisciplinarity, a brief outline of recent developments in the neuroscience of morality is provided. Some interdisciplinary collaborations are then explored, which weave together novel methodological affordances from the neurosciences with conceptual models from sociological inquiry. A brief overview of ‘neuroliberalism’ follows, to concretize the growing appeal and practical application of the psy- and neurosciences in governing moral conduct. Finally, some tentative ‘provocations’ are offered, towards fostering moralities that, ultimately, we can live with. 2022-08-05T01:19:15Z 2022-08-05T01:19:15Z 2020 Journal Article Wade, M. (2020). Risky disciplining: on interdisciplinarity between sociology and cognitive neuroscience in the governing of morality. European Journal of Social Theory, 23(1), 72-92. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368431018810330 1368-4310 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/160872 10.1177/1368431018810330 2-s2.0-85078894467 1 23 72 92 en European Journal of Social Theory © 2019 The Author(s). All rights reserved. |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Social sciences::Sociology Biologization Cognitive Neuroscience |
spellingShingle |
Social sciences::Sociology Biologization Cognitive Neuroscience Wade, Matthew Risky disciplining: on interdisciplinarity between sociology and cognitive neuroscience in the governing of morality |
description |
The neuroscience of morality presents novel approaches in exploring the cognitive and affective underpinnings of moral conduct, and is steadily accumulating influence within discursive frames of biocitizenship. Many claims are infused with varieties of neuro-actuarialism in governing morally risky subjects, with implications that other fields should observe closely. Sociologists and other social scientists, however, have typically been reluctant to interject their expertise. However, a resurgent sociology of morality offers the means by which closer engagement may be realized. In encouraging this interdisciplinarity, a brief outline of recent developments in the neuroscience of morality is provided. Some interdisciplinary collaborations are then explored, which weave together novel methodological affordances from the neurosciences with conceptual models from sociological inquiry. A brief overview of ‘neuroliberalism’ follows, to concretize the growing appeal and practical application of the psy- and neurosciences in governing moral conduct. Finally, some tentative ‘provocations’ are offered, towards fostering moralities that, ultimately, we can live with. |
author2 |
School of Social Sciences |
author_facet |
School of Social Sciences Wade, Matthew |
format |
Article |
author |
Wade, Matthew |
author_sort |
Wade, Matthew |
title |
Risky disciplining: on interdisciplinarity between sociology and cognitive neuroscience in the governing of morality |
title_short |
Risky disciplining: on interdisciplinarity between sociology and cognitive neuroscience in the governing of morality |
title_full |
Risky disciplining: on interdisciplinarity between sociology and cognitive neuroscience in the governing of morality |
title_fullStr |
Risky disciplining: on interdisciplinarity between sociology and cognitive neuroscience in the governing of morality |
title_full_unstemmed |
Risky disciplining: on interdisciplinarity between sociology and cognitive neuroscience in the governing of morality |
title_sort |
risky disciplining: on interdisciplinarity between sociology and cognitive neuroscience in the governing of morality |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/160872 |
_version_ |
1743119480686379008 |