Risky disciplining: on interdisciplinarity between sociology and cognitive neuroscience in the governing of morality

The neuroscience of morality presents novel approaches in exploring the cognitive and affective underpinnings of moral conduct, and is steadily accumulating influence within discursive frames of biocitizenship. Many claims are infused with varieties of neuro-actuarialism in governing morally risky s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wade, Matthew
Other Authors: School of Social Sciences
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/160872
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-160872
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1608722022-08-05T01:19:15Z Risky disciplining: on interdisciplinarity between sociology and cognitive neuroscience in the governing of morality Wade, Matthew School of Social Sciences Centre for Liberal Arts and Social Sciences Social sciences::Sociology Biologization Cognitive Neuroscience The neuroscience of morality presents novel approaches in exploring the cognitive and affective underpinnings of moral conduct, and is steadily accumulating influence within discursive frames of biocitizenship. Many claims are infused with varieties of neuro-actuarialism in governing morally risky subjects, with implications that other fields should observe closely. Sociologists and other social scientists, however, have typically been reluctant to interject their expertise. However, a resurgent sociology of morality offers the means by which closer engagement may be realized. In encouraging this interdisciplinarity, a brief outline of recent developments in the neuroscience of morality is provided. Some interdisciplinary collaborations are then explored, which weave together novel methodological affordances from the neurosciences with conceptual models from sociological inquiry. A brief overview of ‘neuroliberalism’ follows, to concretize the growing appeal and practical application of the psy- and neurosciences in governing moral conduct. Finally, some tentative ‘provocations’ are offered, towards fostering moralities that, ultimately, we can live with. 2022-08-05T01:19:15Z 2022-08-05T01:19:15Z 2020 Journal Article Wade, M. (2020). Risky disciplining: on interdisciplinarity between sociology and cognitive neuroscience in the governing of morality. European Journal of Social Theory, 23(1), 72-92. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368431018810330 1368-4310 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/160872 10.1177/1368431018810330 2-s2.0-85078894467 1 23 72 92 en European Journal of Social Theory © 2019 The Author(s). All rights reserved.
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social sciences::Sociology
Biologization
Cognitive Neuroscience
spellingShingle Social sciences::Sociology
Biologization
Cognitive Neuroscience
Wade, Matthew
Risky disciplining: on interdisciplinarity between sociology and cognitive neuroscience in the governing of morality
description The neuroscience of morality presents novel approaches in exploring the cognitive and affective underpinnings of moral conduct, and is steadily accumulating influence within discursive frames of biocitizenship. Many claims are infused with varieties of neuro-actuarialism in governing morally risky subjects, with implications that other fields should observe closely. Sociologists and other social scientists, however, have typically been reluctant to interject their expertise. However, a resurgent sociology of morality offers the means by which closer engagement may be realized. In encouraging this interdisciplinarity, a brief outline of recent developments in the neuroscience of morality is provided. Some interdisciplinary collaborations are then explored, which weave together novel methodological affordances from the neurosciences with conceptual models from sociological inquiry. A brief overview of ‘neuroliberalism’ follows, to concretize the growing appeal and practical application of the psy- and neurosciences in governing moral conduct. Finally, some tentative ‘provocations’ are offered, towards fostering moralities that, ultimately, we can live with.
author2 School of Social Sciences
author_facet School of Social Sciences
Wade, Matthew
format Article
author Wade, Matthew
author_sort Wade, Matthew
title Risky disciplining: on interdisciplinarity between sociology and cognitive neuroscience in the governing of morality
title_short Risky disciplining: on interdisciplinarity between sociology and cognitive neuroscience in the governing of morality
title_full Risky disciplining: on interdisciplinarity between sociology and cognitive neuroscience in the governing of morality
title_fullStr Risky disciplining: on interdisciplinarity between sociology and cognitive neuroscience in the governing of morality
title_full_unstemmed Risky disciplining: on interdisciplinarity between sociology and cognitive neuroscience in the governing of morality
title_sort risky disciplining: on interdisciplinarity between sociology and cognitive neuroscience in the governing of morality
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/160872
_version_ 1743119480686379008