Risky disciplining: on interdisciplinarity between sociology and cognitive neuroscience in the governing of morality
The neuroscience of morality presents novel approaches in exploring the cognitive and affective underpinnings of moral conduct, and is steadily accumulating influence within discursive frames of biocitizenship. Many claims are infused with varieties of neuro-actuarialism in governing morally risky s...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Wade, Matthew |
---|---|
Other Authors: | School of Social Sciences |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/160872 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Disciplines, Area Studies, and Publics: Rethinking Sociology in a Global World
by: SAITO, Hiro
Published: (2015) -
A Roadmap for Integrating Neuroscience Into Addiction Treatment: A Consensus of the Neuroscience Interest Group of the International Society of Addiction Medicine
by: Verdejo-Garcia, A., et al.
Published: (2021) -
Tactics of the 'ugly Australian' : morality, masculinity, nationalism and governance amid a cheating controversy in sport
by: Wade, Matthew
Published: (2021) -
Differential Effects of Mood on Risky Choice Versus Advice
by: YANG, Hwajin, et al.
Published: (2009) -
Corrigendum to “Effects of handwriting exercise on functional outcome in Parkinson disease: A randomized controlled trial” [J Clin Neurosci 72C (2020) 298–303] (Journal of Clinical Neuroscience (2020) 72 (298–303), (S096758681931433X), (10.1016/j.jocn.2019.08.119))
by: Nisa Vorasoot, et al.
Published: (2020)