From variability to vulnerability: people exposed to greater variability judge wrongdoers more harshly
Recent decades have seen increased variability in diverse domains, such as the climate and asset prices. As more resources are required to cope with greater variability in the outside world, exposure to greater variability can make people feel that society is more vulnerable. This sense of vulnerabi...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/161278 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-161278 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1612782023-05-19T07:31:18Z From variability to vulnerability: people exposed to greater variability judge wrongdoers more harshly Ding, Yu Savani, Krishna Nanyang Business School Business::Management Moral Judgment Punishment Recent decades have seen increased variability in diverse domains, such as the climate and asset prices. As more resources are required to cope with greater variability in the outside world, exposure to greater variability can make people feel that society is more vulnerable. This sense of vulnerability, in turn, can lead people to judge and punish wrongdoers more harshly. Studies 1a-2c found that people who were exposed to graphs representing greater variability were more willing to punish wrongdoers, both in domains that were related to the source of variability and those that were unrelated. Studies 3 and 4 found that people who experienced more variable dice rolls were more likely to punish unethical behaviors in hypothetical scenarios and in experimental games, even at a financial cost to themselves. Studies 5a and 5b provided evidence for the underlying mechanism-sense of vulnerability-using correlational designs. Study 6 provided experimental evidence for the underlying mechanism. These findings suggest that increasing variability in diverse domains can have unexpected psychological consequences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved). 2022-08-23T07:10:37Z 2022-08-23T07:10:37Z 2020 Journal Article Ding, Y. & Savani, K. (2020). From variability to vulnerability: people exposed to greater variability judge wrongdoers more harshly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(6), 1101-1117. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000185 0022-3514 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/161278 10.1037/pspa0000185 31999154 2-s2.0-85078835256 6 118 1101 1117 en Journal of Personality and Social Psychology © 2020 American Psychological Association. All rights reserved. |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Business::Management Moral Judgment Punishment |
spellingShingle |
Business::Management Moral Judgment Punishment Ding, Yu Savani, Krishna From variability to vulnerability: people exposed to greater variability judge wrongdoers more harshly |
description |
Recent decades have seen increased variability in diverse domains, such as the climate and asset prices. As more resources are required to cope with greater variability in the outside world, exposure to greater variability can make people feel that society is more vulnerable. This sense of vulnerability, in turn, can lead people to judge and punish wrongdoers more harshly. Studies 1a-2c found that people who were exposed to graphs representing greater variability were more willing to punish wrongdoers, both in domains that were related to the source of variability and those that were unrelated. Studies 3 and 4 found that people who experienced more variable dice rolls were more likely to punish unethical behaviors in hypothetical scenarios and in experimental games, even at a financial cost to themselves. Studies 5a and 5b provided evidence for the underlying mechanism-sense of vulnerability-using correlational designs. Study 6 provided experimental evidence for the underlying mechanism. These findings suggest that increasing variability in diverse domains can have unexpected psychological consequences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved). |
author2 |
Nanyang Business School |
author_facet |
Nanyang Business School Ding, Yu Savani, Krishna |
format |
Article |
author |
Ding, Yu Savani, Krishna |
author_sort |
Ding, Yu |
title |
From variability to vulnerability: people exposed to greater variability judge wrongdoers more harshly |
title_short |
From variability to vulnerability: people exposed to greater variability judge wrongdoers more harshly |
title_full |
From variability to vulnerability: people exposed to greater variability judge wrongdoers more harshly |
title_fullStr |
From variability to vulnerability: people exposed to greater variability judge wrongdoers more harshly |
title_full_unstemmed |
From variability to vulnerability: people exposed to greater variability judge wrongdoers more harshly |
title_sort |
from variability to vulnerability: people exposed to greater variability judge wrongdoers more harshly |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/161278 |
_version_ |
1772827653532811264 |