Does humanization or machinization make the IoT persuasive? The effects of source orientation and social presence

The advent of Internet of Things (IoT) technology has revolutionized both the roles and functions of everyday objects and how users interact with them. Using artificial intelligence (AI) and an advanced capacity for communication, smart objects can now function as communication sources and deliver p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kang, Hyunjin, Kim, Ki Joon
Other Authors: Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/161976
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-161976
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1619762022-09-28T01:36:21Z Does humanization or machinization make the IoT persuasive? The effects of source orientation and social presence Kang, Hyunjin Kim, Ki Joon Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Social sciences::Communication Internet of Things Artificial Intelligence The advent of Internet of Things (IoT) technology has revolutionized both the roles and functions of everyday objects and how users interact with them. Using artificial intelligence (AI) and an advanced capacity for communication, smart objects can now function as communication sources and deliver persuasive messages. This study investigates how different types of agency and source cues shape the persuasiveness of a smart object via social presence. When users interacted with a smart object that exerted its own agency, they sensed greater social presence when the object used machine cues rather than human cues. Conversely, when users interacted with a smart object that allowed the user to exercise their own agency, human cues, rather than machine cues, produced greater feelings of social presence, which enhanced the persuasiveness of the messages conveyed by the object. However, the persuasive effects of social presence were reversed when the interaction prompted AI anxiety in the user. Ministry of Education (MOE) The research was supported by the first author’s Tier 1 Grant (2019- T1-002-115) from Ministry of Education, Singapore. 2022-09-28T01:36:21Z 2022-09-28T01:36:21Z 2022 Journal Article Kang, H. & Kim, K. J. (2022). Does humanization or machinization make the IoT persuasive? The effects of source orientation and social presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 129, 107152-. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107152 0747-5632 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/161976 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107152 2-s2.0-85121630885 129 107152 en 2019- T1-002-115 Computers in Human Behavior © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social sciences::Communication
Internet of Things
Artificial Intelligence
spellingShingle Social sciences::Communication
Internet of Things
Artificial Intelligence
Kang, Hyunjin
Kim, Ki Joon
Does humanization or machinization make the IoT persuasive? The effects of source orientation and social presence
description The advent of Internet of Things (IoT) technology has revolutionized both the roles and functions of everyday objects and how users interact with them. Using artificial intelligence (AI) and an advanced capacity for communication, smart objects can now function as communication sources and deliver persuasive messages. This study investigates how different types of agency and source cues shape the persuasiveness of a smart object via social presence. When users interacted with a smart object that exerted its own agency, they sensed greater social presence when the object used machine cues rather than human cues. Conversely, when users interacted with a smart object that allowed the user to exercise their own agency, human cues, rather than machine cues, produced greater feelings of social presence, which enhanced the persuasiveness of the messages conveyed by the object. However, the persuasive effects of social presence were reversed when the interaction prompted AI anxiety in the user.
author2 Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
author_facet Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Kang, Hyunjin
Kim, Ki Joon
format Article
author Kang, Hyunjin
Kim, Ki Joon
author_sort Kang, Hyunjin
title Does humanization or machinization make the IoT persuasive? The effects of source orientation and social presence
title_short Does humanization or machinization make the IoT persuasive? The effects of source orientation and social presence
title_full Does humanization or machinization make the IoT persuasive? The effects of source orientation and social presence
title_fullStr Does humanization or machinization make the IoT persuasive? The effects of source orientation and social presence
title_full_unstemmed Does humanization or machinization make the IoT persuasive? The effects of source orientation and social presence
title_sort does humanization or machinization make the iot persuasive? the effects of source orientation and social presence
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/161976
_version_ 1745574657652686848