Does humanization or machinization make the IoT persuasive? The effects of source orientation and social presence
The advent of Internet of Things (IoT) technology has revolutionized both the roles and functions of everyday objects and how users interact with them. Using artificial intelligence (AI) and an advanced capacity for communication, smart objects can now function as communication sources and deliver p...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/161976 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-161976 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1619762022-09-28T01:36:21Z Does humanization or machinization make the IoT persuasive? The effects of source orientation and social presence Kang, Hyunjin Kim, Ki Joon Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Social sciences::Communication Internet of Things Artificial Intelligence The advent of Internet of Things (IoT) technology has revolutionized both the roles and functions of everyday objects and how users interact with them. Using artificial intelligence (AI) and an advanced capacity for communication, smart objects can now function as communication sources and deliver persuasive messages. This study investigates how different types of agency and source cues shape the persuasiveness of a smart object via social presence. When users interacted with a smart object that exerted its own agency, they sensed greater social presence when the object used machine cues rather than human cues. Conversely, when users interacted with a smart object that allowed the user to exercise their own agency, human cues, rather than machine cues, produced greater feelings of social presence, which enhanced the persuasiveness of the messages conveyed by the object. However, the persuasive effects of social presence were reversed when the interaction prompted AI anxiety in the user. Ministry of Education (MOE) The research was supported by the first author’s Tier 1 Grant (2019- T1-002-115) from Ministry of Education, Singapore. 2022-09-28T01:36:21Z 2022-09-28T01:36:21Z 2022 Journal Article Kang, H. & Kim, K. J. (2022). Does humanization or machinization make the IoT persuasive? The effects of source orientation and social presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 129, 107152-. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107152 0747-5632 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/161976 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107152 2-s2.0-85121630885 129 107152 en 2019- T1-002-115 Computers in Human Behavior © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Social sciences::Communication Internet of Things Artificial Intelligence |
spellingShingle |
Social sciences::Communication Internet of Things Artificial Intelligence Kang, Hyunjin Kim, Ki Joon Does humanization or machinization make the IoT persuasive? The effects of source orientation and social presence |
description |
The advent of Internet of Things (IoT) technology has revolutionized both the roles and functions of everyday objects and how users interact with them. Using artificial intelligence (AI) and an advanced capacity for communication, smart objects can now function as communication sources and deliver persuasive messages. This study investigates how different types of agency and source cues shape the persuasiveness of a smart object via social presence. When users interacted with a smart object that exerted its own agency, they sensed greater social presence when the object used machine cues rather than human cues. Conversely, when users interacted with a smart object that allowed the user to exercise their own agency, human cues, rather than machine cues, produced greater feelings of social presence, which enhanced the persuasiveness of the messages conveyed by the object. However, the persuasive effects of social presence were reversed when the interaction prompted AI anxiety in the user. |
author2 |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information |
author_facet |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Kang, Hyunjin Kim, Ki Joon |
format |
Article |
author |
Kang, Hyunjin Kim, Ki Joon |
author_sort |
Kang, Hyunjin |
title |
Does humanization or machinization make the IoT persuasive? The effects of source orientation and social presence |
title_short |
Does humanization or machinization make the IoT persuasive? The effects of source orientation and social presence |
title_full |
Does humanization or machinization make the IoT persuasive? The effects of source orientation and social presence |
title_fullStr |
Does humanization or machinization make the IoT persuasive? The effects of source orientation and social presence |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does humanization or machinization make the IoT persuasive? The effects of source orientation and social presence |
title_sort |
does humanization or machinization make the iot persuasive? the effects of source orientation and social presence |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/161976 |
_version_ |
1745574657652686848 |