The parliament and cooperative oversight of the indonesian armed forces: why civil–military relations in Indonesia is stable but still in transition

Parliamentary oversight is a cornerstone of democratic control of the armed forces, but its influence on civil–military relations (CMR) remains underexplored. We argue that parliaments in transitioning democracies face unique structural challenges in developing robust oversight of the military compa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ng, Jefferson, Kurniawan, Yudha
Other Authors: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/164455
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-164455
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1644552023-03-05T17:24:11Z The parliament and cooperative oversight of the indonesian armed forces: why civil–military relations in Indonesia is stable but still in transition Ng, Jefferson Kurniawan, Yudha S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Social sciences::Political science Parliamentary Oversight Defense Reform Parliamentary oversight is a cornerstone of democratic control of the armed forces, but its influence on civil–military relations (CMR) remains underexplored. We argue that parliaments in transitioning democracies face unique structural challenges in developing robust oversight of the military compared to advanced democracies. We developed a typology of three distinctive types of parliamentary oversight and proposed that cooperative oversight potentially offers a solution to structural challenges faced by parliaments in transitioning democracies. In our case study of Indonesia, cooperative oversight promoted harmonious working relations between the Parliament and the military/executive, stabilizing CMR. However, cooperative oversight also stalled civil–military reforms, eroded democratic management of the defense sector, and reinforced an unhealthy dependence on the military to self-regulate and the President’s appointment power of the armed forces’ commander. Over the longer term, we believe that the Indonesian Parliament needs to incorporate a mix of oversight strategies and raise its institutional capacity to strengthen oversight of the defence sector. Submitted/Accepted version 2023-01-26T00:42:31Z 2023-01-26T00:42:31Z 2022 Journal Article Ng, J. & Kurniawan, Y. (2022). The parliament and cooperative oversight of the indonesian armed forces: why civil–military relations in Indonesia is stable but still in transition. Armed Forces & Society. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095327X221137281 0095-327X https://hdl.handle.net/10356/164455 10.1177/0095327X221137281 2-s2.0-85142754264 en Armed Forces & Society © 2022 The Author(s). All rights reserved. This paper was published in Armed Forces & Society and is made available with permission of The Author(s). application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social sciences::Political science
Parliamentary Oversight
Defense Reform
spellingShingle Social sciences::Political science
Parliamentary Oversight
Defense Reform
Ng, Jefferson
Kurniawan, Yudha
The parliament and cooperative oversight of the indonesian armed forces: why civil–military relations in Indonesia is stable but still in transition
description Parliamentary oversight is a cornerstone of democratic control of the armed forces, but its influence on civil–military relations (CMR) remains underexplored. We argue that parliaments in transitioning democracies face unique structural challenges in developing robust oversight of the military compared to advanced democracies. We developed a typology of three distinctive types of parliamentary oversight and proposed that cooperative oversight potentially offers a solution to structural challenges faced by parliaments in transitioning democracies. In our case study of Indonesia, cooperative oversight promoted harmonious working relations between the Parliament and the military/executive, stabilizing CMR. However, cooperative oversight also stalled civil–military reforms, eroded democratic management of the defense sector, and reinforced an unhealthy dependence on the military to self-regulate and the President’s appointment power of the armed forces’ commander. Over the longer term, we believe that the Indonesian Parliament needs to incorporate a mix of oversight strategies and raise its institutional capacity to strengthen oversight of the defence sector.
author2 S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies
author_facet S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies
Ng, Jefferson
Kurniawan, Yudha
format Article
author Ng, Jefferson
Kurniawan, Yudha
author_sort Ng, Jefferson
title The parliament and cooperative oversight of the indonesian armed forces: why civil–military relations in Indonesia is stable but still in transition
title_short The parliament and cooperative oversight of the indonesian armed forces: why civil–military relations in Indonesia is stable but still in transition
title_full The parliament and cooperative oversight of the indonesian armed forces: why civil–military relations in Indonesia is stable but still in transition
title_fullStr The parliament and cooperative oversight of the indonesian armed forces: why civil–military relations in Indonesia is stable but still in transition
title_full_unstemmed The parliament and cooperative oversight of the indonesian armed forces: why civil–military relations in Indonesia is stable but still in transition
title_sort parliament and cooperative oversight of the indonesian armed forces: why civil–military relations in indonesia is stable but still in transition
publishDate 2023
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/164455
_version_ 1759858051898146816