The parliament and cooperative oversight of the indonesian armed forces: why civil–military relations in Indonesia is stable but still in transition
Parliamentary oversight is a cornerstone of democratic control of the armed forces, but its influence on civil–military relations (CMR) remains underexplored. We argue that parliaments in transitioning democracies face unique structural challenges in developing robust oversight of the military compa...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/164455 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-164455 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1644552023-03-05T17:24:11Z The parliament and cooperative oversight of the indonesian armed forces: why civil–military relations in Indonesia is stable but still in transition Ng, Jefferson Kurniawan, Yudha S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Social sciences::Political science Parliamentary Oversight Defense Reform Parliamentary oversight is a cornerstone of democratic control of the armed forces, but its influence on civil–military relations (CMR) remains underexplored. We argue that parliaments in transitioning democracies face unique structural challenges in developing robust oversight of the military compared to advanced democracies. We developed a typology of three distinctive types of parliamentary oversight and proposed that cooperative oversight potentially offers a solution to structural challenges faced by parliaments in transitioning democracies. In our case study of Indonesia, cooperative oversight promoted harmonious working relations between the Parliament and the military/executive, stabilizing CMR. However, cooperative oversight also stalled civil–military reforms, eroded democratic management of the defense sector, and reinforced an unhealthy dependence on the military to self-regulate and the President’s appointment power of the armed forces’ commander. Over the longer term, we believe that the Indonesian Parliament needs to incorporate a mix of oversight strategies and raise its institutional capacity to strengthen oversight of the defence sector. Submitted/Accepted version 2023-01-26T00:42:31Z 2023-01-26T00:42:31Z 2022 Journal Article Ng, J. & Kurniawan, Y. (2022). The parliament and cooperative oversight of the indonesian armed forces: why civil–military relations in Indonesia is stable but still in transition. Armed Forces & Society. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095327X221137281 0095-327X https://hdl.handle.net/10356/164455 10.1177/0095327X221137281 2-s2.0-85142754264 en Armed Forces & Society © 2022 The Author(s). All rights reserved. This paper was published in Armed Forces & Society and is made available with permission of The Author(s). application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Social sciences::Political science Parliamentary Oversight Defense Reform |
spellingShingle |
Social sciences::Political science Parliamentary Oversight Defense Reform Ng, Jefferson Kurniawan, Yudha The parliament and cooperative oversight of the indonesian armed forces: why civil–military relations in Indonesia is stable but still in transition |
description |
Parliamentary oversight is a cornerstone of democratic control of the armed forces, but its influence on civil–military relations (CMR) remains underexplored. We argue that parliaments in transitioning democracies face unique structural challenges in developing robust oversight of the military compared to advanced democracies. We developed a typology of three distinctive types of parliamentary oversight and proposed that cooperative oversight potentially offers a solution to structural challenges faced by parliaments in transitioning democracies. In our case study of Indonesia, cooperative oversight promoted harmonious working relations between the Parliament and the military/executive, stabilizing CMR. However, cooperative oversight also stalled civil–military reforms, eroded democratic management of the defense sector, and reinforced an unhealthy dependence on the military to self-regulate and the President’s appointment power of the armed forces’ commander. Over the longer term, we believe that the Indonesian Parliament needs to incorporate a mix of oversight strategies and raise its institutional capacity to strengthen oversight of the defence sector. |
author2 |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies |
author_facet |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Ng, Jefferson Kurniawan, Yudha |
format |
Article |
author |
Ng, Jefferson Kurniawan, Yudha |
author_sort |
Ng, Jefferson |
title |
The parliament and cooperative oversight of the indonesian armed forces: why civil–military relations in Indonesia is stable but still in transition |
title_short |
The parliament and cooperative oversight of the indonesian armed forces: why civil–military relations in Indonesia is stable but still in transition |
title_full |
The parliament and cooperative oversight of the indonesian armed forces: why civil–military relations in Indonesia is stable but still in transition |
title_fullStr |
The parliament and cooperative oversight of the indonesian armed forces: why civil–military relations in Indonesia is stable but still in transition |
title_full_unstemmed |
The parliament and cooperative oversight of the indonesian armed forces: why civil–military relations in Indonesia is stable but still in transition |
title_sort |
parliament and cooperative oversight of the indonesian armed forces: why civil–military relations in indonesia is stable but still in transition |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/164455 |
_version_ |
1759858051898146816 |