Comparison of FLACS and BASiL model for Ro-Pax ferry LNG bunkering leak analysis

• Main Authors: Lim, Boon How, Ng, Eddie Yin Kwee
• Other Authors: School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: 2023
• Subjects: Engineering::Mechanical engineering; LNG Leak; BASiL Model
• Online Access: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/164717
• Institution: Nanyang Technological University

Performing liquefied natural gas (LNG) bunkering involves the risk of accidental leakage. When released from containment, LNG rapidly vaporizes into flammable natural gas and could lead to flash fire and explosion. Hence, LNG bunkering needs to take place in an area without an ignition source called a safety zone. This study compares the safety zone estimated by the Bunkering Area Safety Information for LNG (BASiL) model with that of the computational fluid dynamic (CFD) software FLACS, for Ro-Pax ferry bunkering. Horizontal leaks covering different wind speeds in eight wind directions were compared between the two models. Additionally, a grid refinement study was performed systematically to quantify the discretization error uncertainty in the CFD. Of 24 leak cases, FLACS and the BASiL model results agreed on 18 cases. In three cases validation was inconclusive due to the CFD error uncertainty. The BASiL model underestimated the safety zone distance in three cases compared with FLACS. Future work would be to perform a higher grid refinement study to confirm inconclusive comparison and examine ways to reduce gas dispersion spread for the worst result.