Why the diner is not defended: a critical examination of the diner's defence

With the well-received reception of plant-based foods, and the advent of cultured meat, the debate over the permissibility of the consumption of non-human animals are set to come back in the spotlight. Following an examination of arguments in the field of moral vegetarianism, I examine the Diner’s D...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Branson, Zachary Andrew
Other Authors: Andrew T. Forcehimes
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: Nanyang Technological University 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/165456
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-165456
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1654562023-04-01T16:56:23Z Why the diner is not defended: a critical examination of the diner's defence Branson, Zachary Andrew Andrew T. Forcehimes School of Humanities forcehimes@ntu.edu.sg Humanities::Philosophy With the well-received reception of plant-based foods, and the advent of cultured meat, the debate over the permissibility of the consumption of non-human animals are set to come back in the spotlight. Following an examination of arguments in the field of moral vegetarianism, I examine the Diner’s Defence by Abelard Podgorski in its attempt to justify the consumption of meat by avoiding the controversial commitments of the moral status of animals and their interests and show how it fails. I will also consider objections to my argument on behalf of Podgorski. Following the dialectic, proponents of the diner must bite the bullet and concede the permissibility of farming humans for consumption and/or/either organ usage or join in the controversial commitments debate to justify the consumption of meat. I will end my paper by discussing the future of the debate with cell-based meat entering the scene and its ethical concerns. Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy 2023-03-27T09:15:05Z 2023-03-27T09:15:05Z 2023 Final Year Project (FYP) Branson, Z. A. (2023). Why the diner is not defended: a critical examination of the diner's defence. Final Year Project (FYP), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/165456 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/165456 en application/pdf Nanyang Technological University
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Humanities::Philosophy
spellingShingle Humanities::Philosophy
Branson, Zachary Andrew
Why the diner is not defended: a critical examination of the diner's defence
description With the well-received reception of plant-based foods, and the advent of cultured meat, the debate over the permissibility of the consumption of non-human animals are set to come back in the spotlight. Following an examination of arguments in the field of moral vegetarianism, I examine the Diner’s Defence by Abelard Podgorski in its attempt to justify the consumption of meat by avoiding the controversial commitments of the moral status of animals and their interests and show how it fails. I will also consider objections to my argument on behalf of Podgorski. Following the dialectic, proponents of the diner must bite the bullet and concede the permissibility of farming humans for consumption and/or/either organ usage or join in the controversial commitments debate to justify the consumption of meat. I will end my paper by discussing the future of the debate with cell-based meat entering the scene and its ethical concerns.
author2 Andrew T. Forcehimes
author_facet Andrew T. Forcehimes
Branson, Zachary Andrew
format Final Year Project
author Branson, Zachary Andrew
author_sort Branson, Zachary Andrew
title Why the diner is not defended: a critical examination of the diner's defence
title_short Why the diner is not defended: a critical examination of the diner's defence
title_full Why the diner is not defended: a critical examination of the diner's defence
title_fullStr Why the diner is not defended: a critical examination of the diner's defence
title_full_unstemmed Why the diner is not defended: a critical examination of the diner's defence
title_sort why the diner is not defended: a critical examination of the diner's defence
publisher Nanyang Technological University
publishDate 2023
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/165456
_version_ 1764208164711956480