Three approaches to platform studies: cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies
Digital media platforms are becoming increasingly subject to the sway of geopolitics, as seen during the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the US-China trade war. How are platforms becoming geopoliticized? What perspectives shall we use to make sense of the process? This theoretical paper reformulates...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/171067 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-171067 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1710672023-10-15T15:33:06Z Three approaches to platform studies: cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies Qiu, Jack Linchuan Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Social sciences::Mass media Platform Studies Geopolitics Digital media platforms are becoming increasingly subject to the sway of geopolitics, as seen during the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the US-China trade war. How are platforms becoming geopoliticized? What perspectives shall we use to make sense of the process? This theoretical paper reformulates conceptual apparatuses of liberalism, realism, and constructivism, each represented by a metaphor: the cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies, respectively. The approaches are introduced, critiqued, and compared to understand platform geopoliticization more historically and imaginatively on global as well as regional and local scales. The discussions propel platform studies to be grounded and multi-layered, concerning not only the apex of politico-economic power but also grassroots and communal praxis, for example, metis. While the pendulum is swinging from transnational capital to nation-states, it is insufficient to restrict our thinking to (neo)realism vis-à-vis (neo)liberalism. A moderate version of constructivism—the “ant societies” model—hence needs articulation, which holds important conceptual and methodological implications. Published version 2023-10-11T02:49:20Z 2023-10-11T02:49:20Z 2023 Journal Article Qiu, J. L. (2023). Three approaches to platform studies: cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies. Social Media and Society, 9(3), 1-13. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20563051231193304 2056-3051 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/171067 10.1177/20563051231193304 2-s2.0-85168860135 3 9 1 13 en Social Media and Society © 2023 The Author(s). Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Social sciences::Mass media Platform Studies Geopolitics |
spellingShingle |
Social sciences::Mass media Platform Studies Geopolitics Qiu, Jack Linchuan Three approaches to platform studies: cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies |
description |
Digital media platforms are becoming increasingly subject to the sway of geopolitics, as seen during the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the US-China trade war. How are platforms becoming geopoliticized? What perspectives shall we use to make sense of the process? This theoretical paper reformulates conceptual apparatuses of liberalism, realism, and constructivism, each represented by a metaphor: the cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies, respectively. The approaches are introduced, critiqued, and compared to understand platform geopoliticization more historically and imaginatively on global as well as regional and local scales. The discussions propel platform studies to be grounded and multi-layered, concerning not only the apex of politico-economic power but also grassroots and communal praxis, for example, metis. While the pendulum is swinging from transnational capital to nation-states, it is insufficient to restrict our thinking to (neo)realism vis-à-vis (neo)liberalism. A moderate version of constructivism—the “ant societies” model—hence needs articulation, which holds important conceptual and methodological implications. |
author2 |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information |
author_facet |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Qiu, Jack Linchuan |
format |
Article |
author |
Qiu, Jack Linchuan |
author_sort |
Qiu, Jack Linchuan |
title |
Three approaches to platform studies: cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies |
title_short |
Three approaches to platform studies: cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies |
title_full |
Three approaches to platform studies: cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies |
title_fullStr |
Three approaches to platform studies: cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Three approaches to platform studies: cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies |
title_sort |
three approaches to platform studies: cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/171067 |
_version_ |
1781793782665052160 |