Three approaches to platform studies: cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies

Digital media platforms are becoming increasingly subject to the sway of geopolitics, as seen during the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the US-China trade war. How are platforms becoming geopoliticized? What perspectives shall we use to make sense of the process? This theoretical paper reformulates...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Qiu, Jack Linchuan
Other Authors: Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/171067
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-171067
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1710672023-10-15T15:33:06Z Three approaches to platform studies: cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies Qiu, Jack Linchuan Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Social sciences::Mass media Platform Studies Geopolitics Digital media platforms are becoming increasingly subject to the sway of geopolitics, as seen during the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the US-China trade war. How are platforms becoming geopoliticized? What perspectives shall we use to make sense of the process? This theoretical paper reformulates conceptual apparatuses of liberalism, realism, and constructivism, each represented by a metaphor: the cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies, respectively. The approaches are introduced, critiqued, and compared to understand platform geopoliticization more historically and imaginatively on global as well as regional and local scales. The discussions propel platform studies to be grounded and multi-layered, concerning not only the apex of politico-economic power but also grassroots and communal praxis, for example, metis. While the pendulum is swinging from transnational capital to nation-states, it is insufficient to restrict our thinking to (neo)realism vis-à-vis (neo)liberalism. A moderate version of constructivism—the “ant societies” model—hence needs articulation, which holds important conceptual and methodological implications. Published version 2023-10-11T02:49:20Z 2023-10-11T02:49:20Z 2023 Journal Article Qiu, J. L. (2023). Three approaches to platform studies: cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies. Social Media and Society, 9(3), 1-13. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20563051231193304 2056-3051 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/171067 10.1177/20563051231193304 2-s2.0-85168860135 3 9 1 13 en Social Media and Society © 2023 The Author(s). Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social sciences::Mass media
Platform Studies
Geopolitics
spellingShingle Social sciences::Mass media
Platform Studies
Geopolitics
Qiu, Jack Linchuan
Three approaches to platform studies: cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies
description Digital media platforms are becoming increasingly subject to the sway of geopolitics, as seen during the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the US-China trade war. How are platforms becoming geopoliticized? What perspectives shall we use to make sense of the process? This theoretical paper reformulates conceptual apparatuses of liberalism, realism, and constructivism, each represented by a metaphor: the cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies, respectively. The approaches are introduced, critiqued, and compared to understand platform geopoliticization more historically and imaginatively on global as well as regional and local scales. The discussions propel platform studies to be grounded and multi-layered, concerning not only the apex of politico-economic power but also grassroots and communal praxis, for example, metis. While the pendulum is swinging from transnational capital to nation-states, it is insufficient to restrict our thinking to (neo)realism vis-à-vis (neo)liberalism. A moderate version of constructivism—the “ant societies” model—hence needs articulation, which holds important conceptual and methodological implications.
author2 Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
author_facet Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Qiu, Jack Linchuan
format Article
author Qiu, Jack Linchuan
author_sort Qiu, Jack Linchuan
title Three approaches to platform studies: cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies
title_short Three approaches to platform studies: cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies
title_full Three approaches to platform studies: cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies
title_fullStr Three approaches to platform studies: cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies
title_full_unstemmed Three approaches to platform studies: cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies
title_sort three approaches to platform studies: cobweb, billiard balls, and ant societies
publishDate 2023
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/171067
_version_ 1781793782665052160