Does medical education reform change who is selected? A national cross-sectional survey from China
Objectives: Approximately 10 years ago, China introduced an education plan to improve the overall quality of medical education and to better serve the population's health needs. Many medical schools were then recognised and financed by China's Ministry of Education to develop and operation...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/171611 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-171611 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1716112023-11-05T15:39:10Z Does medical education reform change who is selected? A national cross-sectional survey from China You, You Wang, Weimin Cleland, Jennifer Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) Science::Medicine Academic Achievement Medical Education Objectives: Approximately 10 years ago, China introduced an education plan to improve the overall quality of medical education and to better serve the population's health needs. Many medical schools were then recognised and financed by China's Ministry of Education to develop and operationalise new pilot programmes (PPs) aligned with this plan. These ran in parallel with the traditional programmes (TPs). One way to achieve the plan's first aim, improving the quality of medical education, is to select academically stronger candidates. We, thus, examined and compared who were selected into PPs and TPs. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Data were collected from 123 medical schools across China via the 2021 China Medical Student Survey. Participants: Participants were undergraduate clinical medicine students across all year groups. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Medical school selection was via the National College Entrance Examination (NCEE). Medical students' NCEE performance and their sociodemographics were used as the primary and secondary outcome measures. Mann-Whitney or χ 2 tests were used to compare the means between educational programmes (PPs vs TPs) and various selection outcomes. Multilevel mixed-effects regressions were employed to account for school idiosyncratic selection results. Results: Of the 204 817 respondents, 194 163 (94.8%) were in a TP and 10 654 (5.2%) a PP. PP respondents (median=75.2, IQR=69.5-78.8) had significantly higher NCEE scores than their TP counterparts (median=73.9, IQR=68.5-78.7). Holding constant their NCEE score, PP respondents were significantly more likely to come from urban areas, not be first-generation college students, and have parents with higher occupational status and income. Conclusions: Assuming quality can be indicated by prior academic achievement at the point of selection, PPs achieved this mission. However, doing so limited medical students' diversity. This may be unhelpful in achieving the Education Plan's goal to better serve China's health needs. Published version This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72274003) and National Centre for Health Professions Education Development (No. MEDU2019R004). 2023-11-01T04:04:59Z 2023-11-01T04:04:59Z 2023 Journal Article You, Y., Wang, W. & Cleland, J. (2023). Does medical education reform change who is selected? A national cross-sectional survey from China. BMJ Open, 13(8), e070239-. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070239 2044-6055 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/171611 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070239 37567746 2-s2.0-85167740179 8 13 e070239 en BMJ Open © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Published by BMJ. Open access. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Science::Medicine Academic Achievement Medical Education |
spellingShingle |
Science::Medicine Academic Achievement Medical Education You, You Wang, Weimin Cleland, Jennifer Does medical education reform change who is selected? A national cross-sectional survey from China |
description |
Objectives: Approximately 10 years ago, China introduced an education plan to improve the overall quality of medical education and to better serve the population's health needs. Many medical schools were then recognised and financed by China's Ministry of Education to develop and operationalise new pilot programmes (PPs) aligned with this plan. These ran in parallel with the traditional programmes (TPs). One way to achieve the plan's first aim, improving the quality of medical education, is to select academically stronger candidates. We, thus, examined and compared who were selected into PPs and TPs. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Data were collected from 123 medical schools across China via the 2021 China Medical Student Survey. Participants: Participants were undergraduate clinical medicine students across all year groups. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Medical school selection was via the National College Entrance Examination (NCEE). Medical students' NCEE performance and their sociodemographics were used as the primary and secondary outcome measures. Mann-Whitney or χ 2 tests were used to compare the means between educational programmes (PPs vs TPs) and various selection outcomes. Multilevel mixed-effects regressions were employed to account for school idiosyncratic selection results. Results: Of the 204 817 respondents, 194 163 (94.8%) were in a TP and 10 654 (5.2%) a PP. PP respondents (median=75.2, IQR=69.5-78.8) had significantly higher NCEE scores than their TP counterparts (median=73.9, IQR=68.5-78.7). Holding constant their NCEE score, PP respondents were significantly more likely to come from urban areas, not be first-generation college students, and have parents with higher occupational status and income. Conclusions: Assuming quality can be indicated by prior academic achievement at the point of selection, PPs achieved this mission. However, doing so limited medical students' diversity. This may be unhelpful in achieving the Education Plan's goal to better serve China's health needs. |
author2 |
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) |
author_facet |
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) You, You Wang, Weimin Cleland, Jennifer |
format |
Article |
author |
You, You Wang, Weimin Cleland, Jennifer |
author_sort |
You, You |
title |
Does medical education reform change who is selected? A national cross-sectional survey from China |
title_short |
Does medical education reform change who is selected? A national cross-sectional survey from China |
title_full |
Does medical education reform change who is selected? A national cross-sectional survey from China |
title_fullStr |
Does medical education reform change who is selected? A national cross-sectional survey from China |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does medical education reform change who is selected? A national cross-sectional survey from China |
title_sort |
does medical education reform change who is selected? a national cross-sectional survey from china |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/171611 |
_version_ |
1783955488289849344 |