Students' engagement and learning effectiveness during procedural learning

With the growing importance of STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) subjects, it is imperative to consider how one can effectively learn complex concepts in these fields. Worked examples (where one is presented with the worked-out solution to a problem) and problem-solving (where...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lim, Morgan Xi
Other Authors: Darren Yeo
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: Nanyang Technological University 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/175731
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-175731
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1757312024-05-12T15:32:03Z Students' engagement and learning effectiveness during procedural learning Lim, Morgan Xi Darren Yeo School of Social Sciences darrenyeo@ntu.edu.sg Social Sciences Worked examples Problem-solving Mathematics Cognitive learning theory Engagement With the growing importance of STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) subjects, it is imperative to consider how one can effectively learn complex concepts in these fields. Worked examples (where one is presented with the worked-out solution to a problem) and problem-solving (where one attempts to solve a given question) are both suggested for effective learning. Worked examples have been found to be less engaging than problem-solving, though engagement is a prerequisite for the cognitive learning theory which underlies the worked example effect. If engagement with worked examples is low, then differences between the two learning activities might be due to differential engagement in the activities rather than between the mediums themselves. In order to clarify differences in the effectiveness of learning activities while considering engagement, this study uses three different learning activities: problem-solving, static worked examples (where the full solution is shown at once), and sequential worked examples (where the learner can incrementally show the steps of the solution). It was hypothesized that sequential worked examples allow for similar engagement and thus similar performance as problem-solving on a delayed test, more accurate judgements of learning, with lower mental effort. It was found that engagement with problem-solving trials was higher than both worked example conditions, but performance, estimated judgements of learning, ratings of mental effort, difficulty, and interestingness, did not differ between the three groups. The results suggests that sequential worked examples might be utilized in a variety of ways that result in differential engagement. Bachelor's degree 2024-05-06T01:43:02Z 2024-05-06T01:43:02Z 2024 Final Year Project (FYP) Lim, M. X. (2024). Students' engagement and learning effectiveness during procedural learning. Final Year Project (FYP), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/175731 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/175731 en application/pdf Nanyang Technological University
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social Sciences
Worked examples
Problem-solving
Mathematics
Cognitive learning theory
Engagement
spellingShingle Social Sciences
Worked examples
Problem-solving
Mathematics
Cognitive learning theory
Engagement
Lim, Morgan Xi
Students' engagement and learning effectiveness during procedural learning
description With the growing importance of STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) subjects, it is imperative to consider how one can effectively learn complex concepts in these fields. Worked examples (where one is presented with the worked-out solution to a problem) and problem-solving (where one attempts to solve a given question) are both suggested for effective learning. Worked examples have been found to be less engaging than problem-solving, though engagement is a prerequisite for the cognitive learning theory which underlies the worked example effect. If engagement with worked examples is low, then differences between the two learning activities might be due to differential engagement in the activities rather than between the mediums themselves. In order to clarify differences in the effectiveness of learning activities while considering engagement, this study uses three different learning activities: problem-solving, static worked examples (where the full solution is shown at once), and sequential worked examples (where the learner can incrementally show the steps of the solution). It was hypothesized that sequential worked examples allow for similar engagement and thus similar performance as problem-solving on a delayed test, more accurate judgements of learning, with lower mental effort. It was found that engagement with problem-solving trials was higher than both worked example conditions, but performance, estimated judgements of learning, ratings of mental effort, difficulty, and interestingness, did not differ between the three groups. The results suggests that sequential worked examples might be utilized in a variety of ways that result in differential engagement.
author2 Darren Yeo
author_facet Darren Yeo
Lim, Morgan Xi
format Final Year Project
author Lim, Morgan Xi
author_sort Lim, Morgan Xi
title Students' engagement and learning effectiveness during procedural learning
title_short Students' engagement and learning effectiveness during procedural learning
title_full Students' engagement and learning effectiveness during procedural learning
title_fullStr Students' engagement and learning effectiveness during procedural learning
title_full_unstemmed Students' engagement and learning effectiveness during procedural learning
title_sort students' engagement and learning effectiveness during procedural learning
publisher Nanyang Technological University
publishDate 2024
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/175731
_version_ 1800916121875906560