Once more on the letter ༢

W. S. Coblin. in a contribution (2002) to the ongoing discussion about the phonetic value of the Tibetan letter ,; (transcribed as v), has argued that this character has no phonetic value per se but is rather an orthographic device. A review of the previous literature and consideration of Coblin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hill, Nathan W.
Other Authors: Harvard University
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/177961
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English