Once more on the letter ༢
W. S. Coblin. in a contribution (2002) to the ongoing discussion about the phonetic value of the Tibetan letter ,; (transcribed as v), has argued that this character has no phonetic value per se but is rather an orthographic device. A review of the previous literature and consideration of Coblin...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Hill, Nathan W. |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Harvard University |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/177961 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Tibetan <ḥ-> as a plain initial and its place in old Tibetan phonology
by: Hill, Nathan W.
Published: (2024) -
The phonetic values of the Tibetan letter r in Tibeto-Chinese transcriptional texts from Dunhuang
by: Coblin, W. South
Published: (2024) -
Three notes on Laufer’s law
by: Hill, Nathan W.
Published: (2024) -
Tibetan vwa ‘fox’ and the sound change Tibeto-Burman *wa > Tibetan o
by: Hill, Nathan W.
Published: (2024) -
Evidentiality in Rgyalthang Tibetan
by: Hongladarom, Krisadawan
Published: (2024)