Once more on the letter ༢
W. S. Coblin. in a contribution (2002) to the ongoing discussion about the phonetic value of the Tibetan letter ,; (transcribed as v), has argued that this character has no phonetic value per se but is rather an orthographic device. A review of the previous literature and consideration of Coblin...
Saved in:
主要作者: | |
---|---|
其他作者: | |
格式: | Article |
語言: | English |
出版: |
2024
|
主題: | |
在線閱讀: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/177961 |
標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
成為第一個發表評論!