Topic markers in Hmong
The data that I will present in this paper arise from my investigations of Hmong syntax in light of the claims made by Li and Thompson (1976) about topic-prominence vs. subject-prominence in languages.1 Li and Thompson state that the sentences of some languages can be more insightfully described i...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178924 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
| Language: | English |
| Summary: | The data that I will present in this paper arise from my investigations of Hmong syntax in light of the claims made by Li and Thompson (1976) about topic-prominence vs.
subject-prominence in languages.1 Li and Thompson
state that the sentences of some languages can be more insightfully described in terms of subject-predicate organization, and they call these subject-prominent
languages. Indo-European languages, including especially languages like English and French,fall into this category. In other languages, by contrast, sentences are more insightfully described in terms of topic-comment
organization, according to Li and Thompson, and they call these topic-prominent languages. Lisu, described by Hope (1974), is a prototypical topic-prominent language, and Lahu (Matisoff 1973) and Chinese (Tsao 1979) are also quite topic-prominent. |
|---|