Topic markers in Hmong
The data that I will present in this paper arise from my investigations of Hmong syntax in light of the claims made by Li and Thompson (1976) about topic-prominence vs. subject-prominence in languages.1 Li and Thompson state that the sentences of some languages can be more insightfully described i...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178924 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-178924 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1789242024-07-12T05:19:06Z Topic markers in Hmong Fuller, Judith Wheaton University of Minnesota Arts and Humanities The data that I will present in this paper arise from my investigations of Hmong syntax in light of the claims made by Li and Thompson (1976) about topic-prominence vs. subject-prominence in languages.1 Li and Thompson state that the sentences of some languages can be more insightfully described in terms of subject-predicate organization, and they call these subject-prominent languages. Indo-European languages, including especially languages like English and French,fall into this category. In other languages, by contrast, sentences are more insightfully described in terms of topic-comment organization, according to Li and Thompson, and they call these topic-prominent languages. Lisu, described by Hope (1974), is a prototypical topic-prominent language, and Lahu (Matisoff 1973) and Chinese (Tsao 1979) are also quite topic-prominent. Published version 2024-07-12T05:19:05Z 2024-07-12T05:19:05Z 1987 Journal Article Fuller, J. W. (1987). Topic markers in Hmong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 10(2), 113-127. https://dx.doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.10.2.09 0731-3500 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178924 10.32655/LTBA.10.2.09 2 10 113 127 en Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area © 1987 The Editor(s). All rights reserved. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Arts and Humanities |
spellingShingle |
Arts and Humanities Fuller, Judith Wheaton Topic markers in Hmong |
description |
The data that I will present in this paper arise from my investigations of Hmong syntax in light of the claims made by Li and Thompson (1976) about topic-prominence vs.
subject-prominence in languages.1 Li and Thompson
state that the sentences of some languages can be more insightfully described in terms of subject-predicate organization, and they call these subject-prominent
languages. Indo-European languages, including especially languages like English and French,fall into this category. In other languages, by contrast, sentences are more insightfully described in terms of topic-comment
organization, according to Li and Thompson, and they call these topic-prominent languages. Lisu, described by Hope (1974), is a prototypical topic-prominent language, and Lahu (Matisoff 1973) and Chinese (Tsao 1979) are also quite topic-prominent. |
author2 |
University of Minnesota |
author_facet |
University of Minnesota Fuller, Judith Wheaton |
format |
Article |
author |
Fuller, Judith Wheaton |
author_sort |
Fuller, Judith Wheaton |
title |
Topic markers in Hmong |
title_short |
Topic markers in Hmong |
title_full |
Topic markers in Hmong |
title_fullStr |
Topic markers in Hmong |
title_full_unstemmed |
Topic markers in Hmong |
title_sort |
topic markers in hmong |
publishDate |
2024 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178924 |
_version_ |
1806059891461193728 |