Topic markers in Hmong

The data that I will present in this paper arise from my investigations of Hmong syntax in light of the claims made by Li and Thompson (1976) about topic-prominence vs. subject-prominence in languages.1 Li and Thompson state that the sentences of some languages can be more insightfully described i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fuller, Judith Wheaton
Other Authors: University of Minnesota
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178924
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-178924
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1789242024-07-12T05:19:06Z Topic markers in Hmong Fuller, Judith Wheaton University of Minnesota Arts and Humanities The data that I will present in this paper arise from my investigations of Hmong syntax in light of the claims made by Li and Thompson (1976) about topic-prominence vs. subject-prominence in languages.1 Li and Thompson state that the sentences of some languages can be more insightfully described in terms of subject-predicate organization, and they call these subject-prominent languages. Indo-European languages, including especially languages like English and French,fall into this category. In other languages, by contrast, sentences are more insightfully described in terms of topic-comment organization, according to Li and Thompson, and they call these topic-prominent languages. Lisu, described by Hope (1974), is a prototypical topic-prominent language, and Lahu (Matisoff 1973) and Chinese (Tsao 1979) are also quite topic-prominent. Published version 2024-07-12T05:19:05Z 2024-07-12T05:19:05Z 1987 Journal Article Fuller, J. W. (1987). Topic markers in Hmong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 10(2), 113-127. https://dx.doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.10.2.09 0731-3500 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178924 10.32655/LTBA.10.2.09 2 10 113 127 en Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area © 1987 The Editor(s). All rights reserved. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Arts and Humanities
spellingShingle Arts and Humanities
Fuller, Judith Wheaton
Topic markers in Hmong
description The data that I will present in this paper arise from my investigations of Hmong syntax in light of the claims made by Li and Thompson (1976) about topic-prominence vs. subject-prominence in languages.1 Li and Thompson state that the sentences of some languages can be more insightfully described in terms of subject-predicate organization, and they call these subject-prominent languages. Indo-European languages, including especially languages like English and French,fall into this category. In other languages, by contrast, sentences are more insightfully described in terms of topic-comment organization, according to Li and Thompson, and they call these topic-prominent languages. Lisu, described by Hope (1974), is a prototypical topic-prominent language, and Lahu (Matisoff 1973) and Chinese (Tsao 1979) are also quite topic-prominent.
author2 University of Minnesota
author_facet University of Minnesota
Fuller, Judith Wheaton
format Article
author Fuller, Judith Wheaton
author_sort Fuller, Judith Wheaton
title Topic markers in Hmong
title_short Topic markers in Hmong
title_full Topic markers in Hmong
title_fullStr Topic markers in Hmong
title_full_unstemmed Topic markers in Hmong
title_sort topic markers in hmong
publishDate 2024
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178924
_version_ 1806059891461193728