Self-effects and public commitment on social media: testing the cognitive and social influences of sending messages on message senders
Through a self-effects perspective, this research investigates how people's perceptions of their memories are influenced by sharing those memories on social media. Referencing the bidirectional message effects model and identity shift theory, relevant psychological factors and social media affo...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179220 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-179220 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1792202024-07-23T01:17:44Z Self-effects and public commitment on social media: testing the cognitive and social influences of sending messages on message senders Lew, Zijian Flanagin, Andrew J. Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Social Sciences Bidirectional message effects model Identity shift Through a self-effects perspective, this research investigates how people's perceptions of their memories are influenced by sharing those memories on social media. Referencing the bidirectional message effects model and identity shift theory, relevant psychological factors and social media affordances were identified and tested across two studies. Results from Study 1 showed that the self-relevance of an experience and people's engagement during the experience predicted greater perceived memory vividness and/or recalled enjoyment of the experience. Across both studies, mediation models elucidated the importance of “public commitment” in self-effects: Publicly sharing a message engendered greater presumed close audience knowledge, which led to greater commitment, and resulted in greater perceived memory vividness. However, publicly sharing a message did not directly engender greater commitment. Thus, people are not committed due to the public nature of a statement they made, but rather, are committed to a specific subgroup within the public: their close ties. 2024-07-23T01:17:44Z 2024-07-23T01:17:44Z 2024 Journal Article Lew, Z. & Flanagin, A. J. (2024). Self-effects and public commitment on social media: testing the cognitive and social influences of sending messages on message senders. Computers in Human Behavior, 156, 108200-. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108200 0747-5632 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179220 10.1016/j.chb.2024.108200 2-s2.0-85189661035 156 108200 en Computers in Human Behavior © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Social Sciences Bidirectional message effects model Identity shift |
spellingShingle |
Social Sciences Bidirectional message effects model Identity shift Lew, Zijian Flanagin, Andrew J. Self-effects and public commitment on social media: testing the cognitive and social influences of sending messages on message senders |
description |
Through a self-effects perspective, this research investigates how people's perceptions of their memories are influenced by sharing those memories on social media. Referencing the bidirectional message effects model and identity shift theory, relevant psychological factors and social media affordances were identified and tested across two studies. Results from Study 1 showed that the self-relevance of an experience and people's engagement during the experience predicted greater perceived memory vividness and/or recalled enjoyment of the experience. Across both studies, mediation models elucidated the importance of “public commitment” in self-effects: Publicly sharing a message engendered greater presumed close audience knowledge, which led to greater commitment, and resulted in greater perceived memory vividness. However, publicly sharing a message did not directly engender greater commitment. Thus, people are not committed due to the public nature of a statement they made, but rather, are committed to a specific subgroup within the public: their close ties. |
author2 |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information |
author_facet |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Lew, Zijian Flanagin, Andrew J. |
format |
Article |
author |
Lew, Zijian Flanagin, Andrew J. |
author_sort |
Lew, Zijian |
title |
Self-effects and public commitment on social media: testing the cognitive and social influences of sending messages on message senders |
title_short |
Self-effects and public commitment on social media: testing the cognitive and social influences of sending messages on message senders |
title_full |
Self-effects and public commitment on social media: testing the cognitive and social influences of sending messages on message senders |
title_fullStr |
Self-effects and public commitment on social media: testing the cognitive and social influences of sending messages on message senders |
title_full_unstemmed |
Self-effects and public commitment on social media: testing the cognitive and social influences of sending messages on message senders |
title_sort |
self-effects and public commitment on social media: testing the cognitive and social influences of sending messages on message senders |
publishDate |
2024 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179220 |
_version_ |
1806059854999060480 |