萧红与萧军的革命意志 ：比较《生死场》与《八月的乡村》的女性身体刻画 = Revolutionary will of Xiao Hong and Xiao Jun : comparison of body portrayed between “The Field of Life and Death” and “Village in August”

• Main Author: 李慧仪 Lee, Huiyi
• Other Authors: School of Humanities and Social Sciences
• Format: Final Year Project
• Language: Chinese
• Published: 2012
• Subjects: DRNTU::Social sciences
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10356/48287
• Institution: Nanyang Technological University

萧红《生死场》与萧军《八月的乡村》共同被收入于“奴隶丛书”，为轰动一时的抗日作品。此二书反映类似主题，即主要反映在中国沦陷日本后的东北人民的遭遇。学术界对《生死场》与《八月的乡村》的主题、艺术都有深入的比较，至今却没有学者比较这两部作品中的身体刻画。因此，本文拟通过此二书的身体刻画，探讨萧红与萧军的革命意志。首先，本文将介绍《生死场》与《八月的乡村》的作者与内容，并略述身体在五四与早期革命文学中的地位与价值。接着，将分别探讨与比较此二书如何刻画女性的身体。最后，通过身体的隐喻带出二萧不同的革命意志，即萧军积极的革命意志与萧红消极的革命意志，解释其差异。造成其差异的原因是社会的结构性为萧红带来的限制。Both The Field of Life and Death (Shengsi chang, novel by Xiao Hong) and Village in August (Bayue di xiangcun, novel by Xiao Jun) are the works of the “Series of Slaves”. They enjoyed great popularity throughout China. Both works are set in rural Manchuria and describe the struggle of Chinese guerrilla forces against the Japanese. Much research has been done on the two works from the perspective of theme and narrative techniques, yet none from the perspective of the “body”. The following thesis will examine the revolutionary will of Xiao Hong and Xiao Jun’s as presented in their works, with comparison of the “body” portrayed between them. Firstly, an introduction of the two authors and their respective novels would be given, followed by a review regarding the past studies on the “body”. Next, a comparison between the two works would be done to uncover the revolutionary will of both Xiao Hong and Xiao Jun, through the body metaphor of both works. Last but not least, an analysis will be given to explain the underlying difference of their revolutionary will. The limitation towards Xiao Hong, which created by the structure of the society, causing the difference of their revolutionary will.