Micropatterning Studies of antibodies on PLCL
Tissue engineering would, more often than not, require cells to be instructed in their growth, so as to align to a specific direction or to differentiate into a specific type of cell. Micropatterning of biomacromolecules onto biocompatible polymers has been a suggested answer to this need. Since mos...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/48412 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-48412 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-484122023-03-04T15:39:04Z Micropatterning Studies of antibodies on PLCL Lee, Si. Subramanian Venkatraman School of Materials Science and Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Materials::Biomaterials Tissue engineering would, more often than not, require cells to be instructed in their growth, so as to align to a specific direction or to differentiate into a specific type of cell. Micropatterning of biomacromolecules onto biocompatible polymers has been a suggested answer to this need. Since most polyesters are hydrophobic and therefore have low cell affinity, surface modification serves as a solution. In this study, spincoated compolymer poly(L-lactide-co ε-caprolactone) (PLCL) film was modified by aminosilane and crosslinked by glutaraldehye for the immobilization of FITC-conjugated gelatin dot and line micropatterns using PDMS. Water contact angle measurements showed increased surface wettability for gelatin-immobilized PLCL films. Immobilization of micropatterns was confirmed by fluorescence microscopy and samples were seeded with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and cultured for 5 days. HUVECs imaged via inverted microscope showed that the cells were easily directed by line patterns while it took a longer period of time to see the influence of dot patterns. Alamar Blue (AB) assay was done for days 1, 3 and 5. AB fluorescence intensity showed good cell activity on day 1 but subsequent tests showed low cell activity. The HUVECs were fixated and stained for vinculin, F-actin and nucleus for the 3 time points but confocal laser imaging was unable to detect the dyes. These results suggest that PLCL may not be suitable for HUVEC growth. Bachelor of Engineering (Materials Engineering) 2012-04-17T06:52:29Z 2012-04-17T06:52:29Z 2012 2012 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/48412 en Nanyang Technological University 37 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
DRNTU::Engineering::Materials::Biomaterials |
spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Engineering::Materials::Biomaterials Lee, Si. Micropatterning Studies of antibodies on PLCL |
description |
Tissue engineering would, more often than not, require cells to be instructed in their growth, so as to align to a specific direction or to differentiate into a specific type of cell. Micropatterning of biomacromolecules onto biocompatible polymers has been a suggested answer to this need. Since most polyesters are hydrophobic and therefore have low cell affinity, surface modification serves as a solution. In this study, spincoated compolymer poly(L-lactide-co ε-caprolactone) (PLCL) film was modified by aminosilane and crosslinked by glutaraldehye for the immobilization of FITC-conjugated gelatin dot and line micropatterns using PDMS. Water contact angle measurements showed increased surface wettability for gelatin-immobilized PLCL films. Immobilization of micropatterns was confirmed by fluorescence microscopy and samples were seeded with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and cultured for 5 days. HUVECs imaged via inverted microscope showed that the cells were easily directed by line patterns while it took a longer period of time to see the influence of dot patterns. Alamar Blue (AB) assay was done for days 1, 3 and 5. AB fluorescence intensity showed good cell activity on day 1 but subsequent tests showed low cell activity. The HUVECs were fixated and stained for vinculin, F-actin and nucleus for the 3 time points but confocal laser imaging was unable to detect the dyes. These results suggest that PLCL may not be suitable for HUVEC growth. |
author2 |
Subramanian Venkatraman |
author_facet |
Subramanian Venkatraman Lee, Si. |
format |
Final Year Project |
author |
Lee, Si. |
author_sort |
Lee, Si. |
title |
Micropatterning Studies of antibodies on PLCL |
title_short |
Micropatterning Studies of antibodies on PLCL |
title_full |
Micropatterning Studies of antibodies on PLCL |
title_fullStr |
Micropatterning Studies of antibodies on PLCL |
title_full_unstemmed |
Micropatterning Studies of antibodies on PLCL |
title_sort |
micropatterning studies of antibodies on plcl |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10356/48412 |
_version_ |
1759857558652190720 |