Micropatterning Studies of antibodies on PLCL

Tissue engineering would, more often than not, require cells to be instructed in their growth, so as to align to a specific direction or to differentiate into a specific type of cell. Micropatterning of biomacromolecules onto biocompatible polymers has been a suggested answer to this need. Since mos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lee, Si.
Other Authors: Subramanian Venkatraman
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/48412
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-48412
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-484122023-03-04T15:39:04Z Micropatterning Studies of antibodies on PLCL Lee, Si. Subramanian Venkatraman School of Materials Science and Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Materials::Biomaterials Tissue engineering would, more often than not, require cells to be instructed in their growth, so as to align to a specific direction or to differentiate into a specific type of cell. Micropatterning of biomacromolecules onto biocompatible polymers has been a suggested answer to this need. Since most polyesters are hydrophobic and therefore have low cell affinity, surface modification serves as a solution. In this study, spincoated compolymer poly(L-lactide-co ε-caprolactone) (PLCL) film was modified by aminosilane and crosslinked by glutaraldehye for the immobilization of FITC-conjugated gelatin dot and line micropatterns using PDMS. Water contact angle measurements showed increased surface wettability for gelatin-immobilized PLCL films. Immobilization of micropatterns was confirmed by fluorescence microscopy and samples were seeded with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and cultured for 5 days. HUVECs imaged via inverted microscope showed that the cells were easily directed by line patterns while it took a longer period of time to see the influence of dot patterns. Alamar Blue (AB) assay was done for days 1, 3 and 5. AB fluorescence intensity showed good cell activity on day 1 but subsequent tests showed low cell activity. The HUVECs were fixated and stained for vinculin, F-actin and nucleus for the 3 time points but confocal laser imaging was unable to detect the dyes. These results suggest that PLCL may not be suitable for HUVEC growth. Bachelor of Engineering (Materials Engineering) 2012-04-17T06:52:29Z 2012-04-17T06:52:29Z 2012 2012 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/48412 en Nanyang Technological University 37 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering::Materials::Biomaterials
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering::Materials::Biomaterials
Lee, Si.
Micropatterning Studies of antibodies on PLCL
description Tissue engineering would, more often than not, require cells to be instructed in their growth, so as to align to a specific direction or to differentiate into a specific type of cell. Micropatterning of biomacromolecules onto biocompatible polymers has been a suggested answer to this need. Since most polyesters are hydrophobic and therefore have low cell affinity, surface modification serves as a solution. In this study, spincoated compolymer poly(L-lactide-co ε-caprolactone) (PLCL) film was modified by aminosilane and crosslinked by glutaraldehye for the immobilization of FITC-conjugated gelatin dot and line micropatterns using PDMS. Water contact angle measurements showed increased surface wettability for gelatin-immobilized PLCL films. Immobilization of micropatterns was confirmed by fluorescence microscopy and samples were seeded with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and cultured for 5 days. HUVECs imaged via inverted microscope showed that the cells were easily directed by line patterns while it took a longer period of time to see the influence of dot patterns. Alamar Blue (AB) assay was done for days 1, 3 and 5. AB fluorescence intensity showed good cell activity on day 1 but subsequent tests showed low cell activity. The HUVECs were fixated and stained for vinculin, F-actin and nucleus for the 3 time points but confocal laser imaging was unable to detect the dyes. These results suggest that PLCL may not be suitable for HUVEC growth.
author2 Subramanian Venkatraman
author_facet Subramanian Venkatraman
Lee, Si.
format Final Year Project
author Lee, Si.
author_sort Lee, Si.
title Micropatterning Studies of antibodies on PLCL
title_short Micropatterning Studies of antibodies on PLCL
title_full Micropatterning Studies of antibodies on PLCL
title_fullStr Micropatterning Studies of antibodies on PLCL
title_full_unstemmed Micropatterning Studies of antibodies on PLCL
title_sort micropatterning studies of antibodies on plcl
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/48412
_version_ 1759857558652190720