Treatment of dilute wastewater using different types of support media in anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactors

Anaerobic wastewater treatment is advantageous over its aerobic counterpart due to reasons including lower energy expenditure and the possibility to recover energy in the process. However, with the use of membrane in anaerobic treatment process, fouling is one major issue when membrane pore...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tai, Jia Yi
Other Authors: Philip Wong
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/53375
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
Description
Summary:Anaerobic wastewater treatment is advantageous over its aerobic counterpart due to reasons including lower energy expenditure and the possibility to recover energy in the process. However, with the use of membrane in anaerobic treatment process, fouling is one major issue when membrane pores are clogged due to flocculation of sludge agglomerate and accumulated biomass. One way of fouling control is to include carriers in the system such that immobilization of biomass help decrease the dispersed biomass in the bulk and mitigate fouling as a result. In addition, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and soluble microbial products (SMP) also contribute to controlling membrane fouling. In this study, seven types of support media are tested within the two-stage anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactor. Five commercialized carriers, namely polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polycarbonate (PC), ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), activated alumina (AAl), are tested and compared to the commonly used powdered activated carbon (PAC) and granular activated carbon (GAC). This study seeks to determine the most suitable carrier for anaerobic wastewater treatment by evaluating the operational cost, biological and membrane performance. Looking at the energy optimization, COD removal, SMP, EPS, VFA and TMP results, it was found out that PAC performed best among the seven support media. Out of the commercialized carriers tested, EVA was good in COD removal and SMP release.