Treatment of dilute wastewater using different types of support media in anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactors

Anaerobic wastewater treatment is advantageous over its aerobic counterpart due to reasons including lower energy expenditure and the possibility to recover energy in the process. However, with the use of membrane in anaerobic treatment process, fouling is one major issue when membrane pore...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tai, Jia Yi
Other Authors: Philip Wong
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/53375
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-53375
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-533752023-03-03T17:04:36Z Treatment of dilute wastewater using different types of support media in anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactors Tai, Jia Yi Philip Wong School of Civil and Environmental Engineering DRNTU::Engineering Anaerobic wastewater treatment is advantageous over its aerobic counterpart due to reasons including lower energy expenditure and the possibility to recover energy in the process. However, with the use of membrane in anaerobic treatment process, fouling is one major issue when membrane pores are clogged due to flocculation of sludge agglomerate and accumulated biomass. One way of fouling control is to include carriers in the system such that immobilization of biomass help decrease the dispersed biomass in the bulk and mitigate fouling as a result. In addition, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and soluble microbial products (SMP) also contribute to controlling membrane fouling. In this study, seven types of support media are tested within the two-stage anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactor. Five commercialized carriers, namely polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polycarbonate (PC), ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), activated alumina (AAl), are tested and compared to the commonly used powdered activated carbon (PAC) and granular activated carbon (GAC). This study seeks to determine the most suitable carrier for anaerobic wastewater treatment by evaluating the operational cost, biological and membrane performance. Looking at the energy optimization, COD removal, SMP, EPS, VFA and TMP results, it was found out that PAC performed best among the seven support media. Out of the commercialized carriers tested, EVA was good in COD removal and SMP release. Bachelor of Engineering (Civil) 2013-06-03T01:57:01Z 2013-06-03T01:57:01Z 2013 2013 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/53375 en Nanyang Technological University 42 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering
Tai, Jia Yi
Treatment of dilute wastewater using different types of support media in anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactors
description Anaerobic wastewater treatment is advantageous over its aerobic counterpart due to reasons including lower energy expenditure and the possibility to recover energy in the process. However, with the use of membrane in anaerobic treatment process, fouling is one major issue when membrane pores are clogged due to flocculation of sludge agglomerate and accumulated biomass. One way of fouling control is to include carriers in the system such that immobilization of biomass help decrease the dispersed biomass in the bulk and mitigate fouling as a result. In addition, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and soluble microbial products (SMP) also contribute to controlling membrane fouling. In this study, seven types of support media are tested within the two-stage anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactor. Five commercialized carriers, namely polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polycarbonate (PC), ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), activated alumina (AAl), are tested and compared to the commonly used powdered activated carbon (PAC) and granular activated carbon (GAC). This study seeks to determine the most suitable carrier for anaerobic wastewater treatment by evaluating the operational cost, biological and membrane performance. Looking at the energy optimization, COD removal, SMP, EPS, VFA and TMP results, it was found out that PAC performed best among the seven support media. Out of the commercialized carriers tested, EVA was good in COD removal and SMP release.
author2 Philip Wong
author_facet Philip Wong
Tai, Jia Yi
format Final Year Project
author Tai, Jia Yi
author_sort Tai, Jia Yi
title Treatment of dilute wastewater using different types of support media in anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactors
title_short Treatment of dilute wastewater using different types of support media in anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactors
title_full Treatment of dilute wastewater using different types of support media in anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactors
title_fullStr Treatment of dilute wastewater using different types of support media in anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactors
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of dilute wastewater using different types of support media in anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactors
title_sort treatment of dilute wastewater using different types of support media in anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactors
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/53375
_version_ 1759853976545656832