Influence of court surfaces on impact cushioning during basketball lay-up

Indoor and outdoor playing surfaces with different cushioning properties can affect movement impact. However, no study has compared impact loading between wooden and asphalt basketball courts. This study compared plantar pressure parameters for the four steps of the lay-up on the wooden and asphalt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Quek, Raymond Kai Kiat
Other Authors: National Institute of Education
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/59154
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-59154
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-591542020-09-27T20:26:28Z Influence of court surfaces on impact cushioning during basketball lay-up Quek, Raymond Kai Kiat National Institute of Education Kong Pui Wah Veni DRNTU::Science Indoor and outdoor playing surfaces with different cushioning properties can affect movement impact. However, no study has compared impact loading between wooden and asphalt basketball courts. This study compared plantar pressure parameters for the four steps of the lay-up on the wooden and asphalt courts. Thirteen healthy males were evaluated in the randomized crossover study wearing the Novel Pedar-X system. Peak contact force, peak pressure and pressure-time integral were measured in eight regions: hallux, lesser toes, medial, central and lateral forefoot, medial and lateral arch and the heel. The contact area was analysed as a whole step. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis. Higher peak forces were observed on the wooden surface at the hallux (p=0.033) [wooden: 70.63(32.37) N, asphalt: 61.38(30.81) N] and medial forefoot (p=0.013) [wooden: 146.39(48.89) N, asphalt: 123.46(49.17) N] of the right landing step. Peak force measured for the left landing step was higher at the lesser toes (p=0.009) [wooden: 162.30(60.09) N, asphalt: 148.33(56.78) N] but lower at the lateral forefoot (p=0.039) [wooden: 163.58(53.79) N, asphalt: 179.45(63.98) N] and lateral arch (p=0.039) [wooden: 144.47(74.95) N, asphalt: 172.90(58.99) with smaller contact area (p=0.033) [wooden: 121.35(16.92) cm2, asphalt: 126.95(14.44) cm2]. No differences for peak pressure and pressure-time integral were found. Results suggest that the wooden surface may elicit a better landing technique by increasing bending at the ankles and decreasing inversion to disperse contact forces more effectively. Additionally, perceived impact of the surface may affect landing strategy. More investigation is needed due to complications in sport-specific movement. Bachelor of Science (Sport Science and Management) 2014-04-24T07:29:41Z 2014-04-24T07:29:41Z 2014 2014 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/59154 en 56 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Science
spellingShingle DRNTU::Science
Quek, Raymond Kai Kiat
Influence of court surfaces on impact cushioning during basketball lay-up
description Indoor and outdoor playing surfaces with different cushioning properties can affect movement impact. However, no study has compared impact loading between wooden and asphalt basketball courts. This study compared plantar pressure parameters for the four steps of the lay-up on the wooden and asphalt courts. Thirteen healthy males were evaluated in the randomized crossover study wearing the Novel Pedar-X system. Peak contact force, peak pressure and pressure-time integral were measured in eight regions: hallux, lesser toes, medial, central and lateral forefoot, medial and lateral arch and the heel. The contact area was analysed as a whole step. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis. Higher peak forces were observed on the wooden surface at the hallux (p=0.033) [wooden: 70.63(32.37) N, asphalt: 61.38(30.81) N] and medial forefoot (p=0.013) [wooden: 146.39(48.89) N, asphalt: 123.46(49.17) N] of the right landing step. Peak force measured for the left landing step was higher at the lesser toes (p=0.009) [wooden: 162.30(60.09) N, asphalt: 148.33(56.78) N] but lower at the lateral forefoot (p=0.039) [wooden: 163.58(53.79) N, asphalt: 179.45(63.98) N] and lateral arch (p=0.039) [wooden: 144.47(74.95) N, asphalt: 172.90(58.99) with smaller contact area (p=0.033) [wooden: 121.35(16.92) cm2, asphalt: 126.95(14.44) cm2]. No differences for peak pressure and pressure-time integral were found. Results suggest that the wooden surface may elicit a better landing technique by increasing bending at the ankles and decreasing inversion to disperse contact forces more effectively. Additionally, perceived impact of the surface may affect landing strategy. More investigation is needed due to complications in sport-specific movement.
author2 National Institute of Education
author_facet National Institute of Education
Quek, Raymond Kai Kiat
format Final Year Project
author Quek, Raymond Kai Kiat
author_sort Quek, Raymond Kai Kiat
title Influence of court surfaces on impact cushioning during basketball lay-up
title_short Influence of court surfaces on impact cushioning during basketball lay-up
title_full Influence of court surfaces on impact cushioning during basketball lay-up
title_fullStr Influence of court surfaces on impact cushioning during basketball lay-up
title_full_unstemmed Influence of court surfaces on impact cushioning during basketball lay-up
title_sort influence of court surfaces on impact cushioning during basketball lay-up
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/59154
_version_ 1681059675973353472