Outcaste and outcast: navigating the caste system in indian literature
India’s caste system has been the dominant social structure for centuries, and because of its close ties with Hinduism, it has largely resisted attempts to dismantle it in the face of political revision, and despite the efforts of lawmakers. The idea of social hierarchy is deeply ingrained in Indian...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/61604 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | India’s caste system has been the dominant social structure for centuries, and because of its close ties with Hinduism, it has largely resisted attempts to dismantle it in the face of political revision, and despite the efforts of lawmakers. The idea of social hierarchy is deeply ingrained in Indian consciousness, and this can be seen in several prominent literary texts in Indian literature in English. With reference to Mulk Raj Anand’s Untouchable, Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things, and The White Tiger by Aravind Adiga, this dissertation will argue that the caste system has embedded a need in India for social hierarchies, and the attempt to dismantle caste has been largely unsuccessful due to the refusal of upper castes/classes to relinquish their positions of power. I propose that this is due to a need to construct an Other in order for members of society to preserve their sense of superiority, resulting in the creation of a different system of appraisal; as India slowly shifts away from the caste system, it has simultaneously moved closer to a hierarchy where one’s worth is determined by socioeconomic status, thus rendering low-income servants “outcasts” that are vulnerable to exploitation, very much like the situations faced by Dalits. Because of this, those belonging to the fringes of society—a space in which they belong to Indian society but are prevented from fully participating in it—are kept in this liminal position. I will then explore various types of performativity that outcastes and outcasts rely on in negotiating their place in the face of social rejection. |
---|