Judicial management : an effective rescue measure
Judicial management was introduced in Singapore on 15 May 1987, and enacted as Part VIlA of the Companies Act. This new corporate rescue measure was introduced to mitigate the harshness of the existing insolvency procedures. Our research examines the effectiveness of judicial management in Singap...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/62975 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | Judicial management was introduced in Singapore on 15 May 1987, and enacted
as Part VIlA of the Companies Act. This new corporate rescue measure was
introduced to mitigate the harshness of the existing insolvency procedures. Our
research examines the effectiveness of judicial management in Singapore. The
effectiveness of its operation is measured in terms of its ability to rehabilitate
troubled companies facing temporary liquidity problems and giving them a new
lease of life to continue their business as going concerns.
Before the introduction of judicial management, other rescue procedures(winding
up, receivership and Section 210 compromise and arrangement) were available for
companies that were in red. However these procedures have their shortcomings,
and they fail to provide a chance of survival for viable companies that are facing
temporary cash flow problems.
A review of judicial management procedures or its equivalent procedures adopted
in other countries was done. This provides essential knowledge on the background
of judicial management in Singapore and helps to trace the source of its adaptation
in Singapore. In addition, the similarities and differences among the provisions of
various countries were examined. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of judicial management in Singapore, two
case studies were reviewed. Thereupon, key factors which attributed to the success
of reviving the troubled companies placed under judicial management were drawn.
The findings from the case studies indicate that the presence of the key success
factors ensures an effective judicial management procedure, hence a greater
likelihood of bringing the troubled companies back onto the road of recovery.
Our research concludes that judicial management is an effective corporate rescue
measure. This is mainly due to its ability to balance the interests of the shareholders
and creditors of the insolvent company and at the same time, it allows the business
of the company to continue as a going concern. |
---|