Analyzing medical personnel’s perceptions of online health rumors
The internet is a hotbed for health rumors which are easily accessible to the public. Rumors are information without verifiable evidence. They can influence public behavior depending on how people perceive them. Prior research has examined perceptions of rumors in terms of intention to trust and...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Final Year Project |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/72626 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
| Language: | English |
| Summary: | The internet is a hotbed for health rumors which are easily accessible to the public. Rumors are
information without verifiable evidence. They can influence public behavior depending on how
people perceive them. Prior research has examined perceptions of rumors in terms of intention to
trust and to share. People that trust a rumor will be influenced to act according to what they believe
to be their best interests, and likewise will be more motivated to share such a rumor. Research has
also shown that these perceptions can be weakened with counter-rumors, which are messages that
directly oppose a rumor.
People that encounter health rumors online will naturally look for clarification with whom they
perceive to be reliable information sources. Medically trained persons thus fall into this role, and it is
important that medical personnel handle health rumors appropriately.
This paper analyzes medical personnel’s intention to trust or share online health rumors as a
function of two factors: rumor type and presence of counter-rumor. The two types of rumors are
dread rumors which warn of bad consequences, and wish rumors which inform of potential benefit.
A total of 60 participants were recruited to do a questionnaire which recorded quantitative scores
for their intention to trust and share health rumors in the absence or presence of counter-rumors. A
2 (rumor type: wish, dread) x 2 (presence of counter-rumor: absent, present) factorial analysis of
variance (ANOVA) was conducted. The results suggest that counter-rumors are effective in reducing
intention to trust and share rumors, especially so for dread rumors. Thus this suggests that medical
personnel are unlikely to trust or share health rumors, and counter messages are effective in
lowering these perceptions. |
|---|