Analyzing medical personnel’s perceptions of online health rumors

The internet is a hotbed for health rumors which are easily accessible to the public. Rumors are information without verifiable evidence. They can influence public behavior depending on how people perceive them. Prior research has examined perceptions of rumors in terms of intention to trust and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Soon, Jeremy Jia Qi
Other Authors: Alton Chua
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/72626
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-72626
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-726262020-11-01T05:32:51Z Analyzing medical personnel’s perceptions of online health rumors Soon, Jeremy Jia Qi Alton Chua Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) DRNTU::Science::Medicine The internet is a hotbed for health rumors which are easily accessible to the public. Rumors are information without verifiable evidence. They can influence public behavior depending on how people perceive them. Prior research has examined perceptions of rumors in terms of intention to trust and to share. People that trust a rumor will be influenced to act according to what they believe to be their best interests, and likewise will be more motivated to share such a rumor. Research has also shown that these perceptions can be weakened with counter-rumors, which are messages that directly oppose a rumor. People that encounter health rumors online will naturally look for clarification with whom they perceive to be reliable information sources. Medically trained persons thus fall into this role, and it is important that medical personnel handle health rumors appropriately. This paper analyzes medical personnel’s intention to trust or share online health rumors as a function of two factors: rumor type and presence of counter-rumor. The two types of rumors are dread rumors which warn of bad consequences, and wish rumors which inform of potential benefit. A total of 60 participants were recruited to do a questionnaire which recorded quantitative scores for their intention to trust and share health rumors in the absence or presence of counter-rumors. A 2 (rumor type: wish, dread) x 2 (presence of counter-rumor: absent, present) factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted. The results suggest that counter-rumors are effective in reducing intention to trust and share rumors, especially so for dread rumors. Thus this suggests that medical personnel are unlikely to trust or share health rumors, and counter messages are effective in lowering these perceptions. Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery 2017-08-31T02:28:03Z 2017-08-31T02:28:03Z 2017 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/72626 en 11 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Science::Medicine
spellingShingle DRNTU::Science::Medicine
Soon, Jeremy Jia Qi
Analyzing medical personnel’s perceptions of online health rumors
description The internet is a hotbed for health rumors which are easily accessible to the public. Rumors are information without verifiable evidence. They can influence public behavior depending on how people perceive them. Prior research has examined perceptions of rumors in terms of intention to trust and to share. People that trust a rumor will be influenced to act according to what they believe to be their best interests, and likewise will be more motivated to share such a rumor. Research has also shown that these perceptions can be weakened with counter-rumors, which are messages that directly oppose a rumor. People that encounter health rumors online will naturally look for clarification with whom they perceive to be reliable information sources. Medically trained persons thus fall into this role, and it is important that medical personnel handle health rumors appropriately. This paper analyzes medical personnel’s intention to trust or share online health rumors as a function of two factors: rumor type and presence of counter-rumor. The two types of rumors are dread rumors which warn of bad consequences, and wish rumors which inform of potential benefit. A total of 60 participants were recruited to do a questionnaire which recorded quantitative scores for their intention to trust and share health rumors in the absence or presence of counter-rumors. A 2 (rumor type: wish, dread) x 2 (presence of counter-rumor: absent, present) factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted. The results suggest that counter-rumors are effective in reducing intention to trust and share rumors, especially so for dread rumors. Thus this suggests that medical personnel are unlikely to trust or share health rumors, and counter messages are effective in lowering these perceptions.
author2 Alton Chua
author_facet Alton Chua
Soon, Jeremy Jia Qi
format Final Year Project
author Soon, Jeremy Jia Qi
author_sort Soon, Jeremy Jia Qi
title Analyzing medical personnel’s perceptions of online health rumors
title_short Analyzing medical personnel’s perceptions of online health rumors
title_full Analyzing medical personnel’s perceptions of online health rumors
title_fullStr Analyzing medical personnel’s perceptions of online health rumors
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing medical personnel’s perceptions of online health rumors
title_sort analyzing medical personnel’s perceptions of online health rumors
publishDate 2017
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/72626
_version_ 1683493327972859904