Movement variation and efficiency of traditional vs standup cycling in sprints : a pilot study

With the growth in cycling population throughout the recent years, there has been a gradual shift within the population itself: leisure to competitive cycling scene. Many cycling research studies were conducted to target and benefit mainly the competitive cyclists. Despite this shift, there are limi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: See, Edzel Khai Wee
Other Authors: Kee Ying Hwa
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/73825
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-73825
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-738252020-09-27T20:24:43Z Movement variation and efficiency of traditional vs standup cycling in sprints : a pilot study See, Edzel Khai Wee Kee Ying Hwa National Institute of Education DRNTU::Science With the growth in cycling population throughout the recent years, there has been a gradual shift within the population itself: leisure to competitive cycling scene. Many cycling research studies were conducted to target and benefit mainly the competitive cyclists. Despite this shift, there are limited studies that focus on cyclists, who are in the midst of this transition. In addition, cycling related studies conducted on the general cycling population often did not take into account movement variation and stability. The aim of this pilot study is to provide an insight to those cyclists, who are in the midst of this transition and to serve as a reference for future related studies. It was hypothesized that standing up cycling will be more beneficial as compared to traditional cycling, in terms of movement variation, stability, cycling efficiency and performance. Motion analysis software (Kinovea) was used to collect and analyze movement variation and stability, while power output readings from MCE, heart rate readings and blood samples were taken to compare differences on performance and cycling efficiency between standing up and traditional cycling. There was a noticeable trend, indicating that standing up cycling during sprints resulted in lower BLCs and high power output. Traditional cycling resulted in lower movement variations and better movement stability. In conclusion, this pilot study gave insights on the various aspects of cycling performance while taking into account movement variability, stability and it serves as a reference with documented limitations of the protocol and analysis procedure while highlighting noticeable trend to narrow the scope and conduct further analysis in future related studies. Bachelor of Science (Sport Science and Management) 2018-04-16T02:59:42Z 2018-04-16T02:59:42Z 2018 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/73825 en 47 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Science
spellingShingle DRNTU::Science
See, Edzel Khai Wee
Movement variation and efficiency of traditional vs standup cycling in sprints : a pilot study
description With the growth in cycling population throughout the recent years, there has been a gradual shift within the population itself: leisure to competitive cycling scene. Many cycling research studies were conducted to target and benefit mainly the competitive cyclists. Despite this shift, there are limited studies that focus on cyclists, who are in the midst of this transition. In addition, cycling related studies conducted on the general cycling population often did not take into account movement variation and stability. The aim of this pilot study is to provide an insight to those cyclists, who are in the midst of this transition and to serve as a reference for future related studies. It was hypothesized that standing up cycling will be more beneficial as compared to traditional cycling, in terms of movement variation, stability, cycling efficiency and performance. Motion analysis software (Kinovea) was used to collect and analyze movement variation and stability, while power output readings from MCE, heart rate readings and blood samples were taken to compare differences on performance and cycling efficiency between standing up and traditional cycling. There was a noticeable trend, indicating that standing up cycling during sprints resulted in lower BLCs and high power output. Traditional cycling resulted in lower movement variations and better movement stability. In conclusion, this pilot study gave insights on the various aspects of cycling performance while taking into account movement variability, stability and it serves as a reference with documented limitations of the protocol and analysis procedure while highlighting noticeable trend to narrow the scope and conduct further analysis in future related studies.
author2 Kee Ying Hwa
author_facet Kee Ying Hwa
See, Edzel Khai Wee
format Final Year Project
author See, Edzel Khai Wee
author_sort See, Edzel Khai Wee
title Movement variation and efficiency of traditional vs standup cycling in sprints : a pilot study
title_short Movement variation and efficiency of traditional vs standup cycling in sprints : a pilot study
title_full Movement variation and efficiency of traditional vs standup cycling in sprints : a pilot study
title_fullStr Movement variation and efficiency of traditional vs standup cycling in sprints : a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Movement variation and efficiency of traditional vs standup cycling in sprints : a pilot study
title_sort movement variation and efficiency of traditional vs standup cycling in sprints : a pilot study
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/73825
_version_ 1681058834082168832