Performance comparisons of various frequency-hopped multiple-access receiver

Frequency-hopped spread-spectrum system is a practiced solution to use the limited bandwidth more efficiently. Frequency-Hopping technology is also considered one of the most efficient communication systems against jamming. This technology has been used in both military and commercial application...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zhang, Xu
Other Authors: Teh Kah Chan
Format: Theses and Dissertations
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/75987
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-75987
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-759872023-07-04T15:55:41Z Performance comparisons of various frequency-hopped multiple-access receiver Zhang, Xu Teh Kah Chan School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering Frequency-hopped spread-spectrum system is a practiced solution to use the limited bandwidth more efficiently. Frequency-Hopping technology is also considered one of the most efficient communication systems against jamming. This technology has been used in both military and commercial applications. Uncoded coherent Binary Frequency Shift Keying (BFSK) system performs is evaluated over various channel conditions. Slow frequency hop (SFH) does not give much improvement to the system performance, so I focus on fast frequency hop (FFH) in this project. Performances of clipper receiver and linear combining receiver using square law detector are compared under slow flat fading channel with multitone jamming and multiple access interferences. The simulation results show that clipper receiver outperformance linear combining receiver when the jamming and multiple access interference (MAI) are strong. The performance improvement is much more obvious when only jamming signal suffers fading as compared with the case when both data signal and jamming signal suffer from fading. Master of Science (Communications Engineering) 2018-09-11T13:21:11Z 2018-09-11T13:21:11Z 2018 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10356/75987 en 57 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering
Zhang, Xu
Performance comparisons of various frequency-hopped multiple-access receiver
description Frequency-hopped spread-spectrum system is a practiced solution to use the limited bandwidth more efficiently. Frequency-Hopping technology is also considered one of the most efficient communication systems against jamming. This technology has been used in both military and commercial applications. Uncoded coherent Binary Frequency Shift Keying (BFSK) system performs is evaluated over various channel conditions. Slow frequency hop (SFH) does not give much improvement to the system performance, so I focus on fast frequency hop (FFH) in this project. Performances of clipper receiver and linear combining receiver using square law detector are compared under slow flat fading channel with multitone jamming and multiple access interferences. The simulation results show that clipper receiver outperformance linear combining receiver when the jamming and multiple access interference (MAI) are strong. The performance improvement is much more obvious when only jamming signal suffers fading as compared with the case when both data signal and jamming signal suffer from fading.
author2 Teh Kah Chan
author_facet Teh Kah Chan
Zhang, Xu
format Theses and Dissertations
author Zhang, Xu
author_sort Zhang, Xu
title Performance comparisons of various frequency-hopped multiple-access receiver
title_short Performance comparisons of various frequency-hopped multiple-access receiver
title_full Performance comparisons of various frequency-hopped multiple-access receiver
title_fullStr Performance comparisons of various frequency-hopped multiple-access receiver
title_full_unstemmed Performance comparisons of various frequency-hopped multiple-access receiver
title_sort performance comparisons of various frequency-hopped multiple-access receiver
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/75987
_version_ 1772825410969534464