Quantitative Evaluation of Peptide–Material Interactions by a Force Mapping Method: Guidelines for Surface Modification
Peptide coatings on material surfaces have demonstrated wide application across materials science and biotechnology, facilitating the development of nanobio interfaces through surface modification. A guiding motivation in the field is to engineer peptides with a high and selective binding affinity t...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81108 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40648 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-81108 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-811082020-06-01T10:21:21Z Quantitative Evaluation of Peptide–Material Interactions by a Force Mapping Method: Guidelines for Surface Modification Jackman, Joshua Alexander Mochizuki, Masahito Oguchi, Masahiro Kim, Seong-Oh Ogawa, Tetsu Lkhamsuren, Ganchimeg Cho, Nam-Joon Hayashi, Tomohiro School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering School of Materials Science & Engineering Chemical and Biomedical Engineering Materials Science and Engineering Peptide coatings on material surfaces have demonstrated wide application across materials science and biotechnology, facilitating the development of nanobio interfaces through surface modification. A guiding motivation in the field is to engineer peptides with a high and selective binding affinity to target materials. Herein, we introduce a quantitative force mapping method in order to evaluate the binding affinity of peptides to various hydrophilic oxide materials by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Statistical analysis of adhesion forces and probabilities obtained on substrates with a materials contrast enabled us to simultaneously compare the peptide binding affinity to different materials. On the basis of the experimental results and corresponding theoretical analysis, we discuss the role of various interfacial forces in modulating the strength of peptide attachment to hydrophilic oxide solid supports as well as to gold. The results emphasize the precision and robustness of our approach to evaluating the adhesion strength of peptides to solid supports, thereby offering guidelines to improve the design and fabrication of peptide-coated materials. NMRC (Natl Medical Research Council, S’pore) 2016-06-09T05:01:14Z 2019-12-06T14:21:33Z 2016-06-09T05:01:14Z 2019-12-06T14:21:33Z 2015 Journal Article Mochizuki, M., Oguchi, M., Kim, S.-O., Jackman, J. A., Ogawa, T., Lkhamsuren, G., et al. (2015). Quantitative Evaluation of Peptide–Material Interactions by a Force Mapping Method: Guidelines for Surface Modification. Langmuir, 31(29), 8006-8012. 0743-7463 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81108 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40648 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01691 en Langmuir © 2015 American Chemical Society. |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Chemical and Biomedical Engineering Materials Science and Engineering |
spellingShingle |
Chemical and Biomedical Engineering Materials Science and Engineering Jackman, Joshua Alexander Mochizuki, Masahito Oguchi, Masahiro Kim, Seong-Oh Ogawa, Tetsu Lkhamsuren, Ganchimeg Cho, Nam-Joon Hayashi, Tomohiro Quantitative Evaluation of Peptide–Material Interactions by a Force Mapping Method: Guidelines for Surface Modification |
description |
Peptide coatings on material surfaces have demonstrated wide application across materials science and biotechnology, facilitating the development of nanobio interfaces through surface modification. A guiding motivation in the field is to engineer peptides with a high and selective binding affinity to target materials. Herein, we introduce a quantitative force mapping method in order to evaluate the binding affinity of peptides to various hydrophilic oxide materials by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Statistical analysis of adhesion forces and probabilities obtained on substrates with a materials contrast enabled us to simultaneously compare the peptide binding affinity to different materials. On the basis of the experimental results and corresponding theoretical analysis, we discuss the role of various interfacial forces in modulating the strength of peptide attachment to hydrophilic oxide solid supports as well as to gold. The results emphasize the precision and robustness of our approach to evaluating the adhesion strength of peptides to solid supports, thereby offering guidelines to improve the design and fabrication of peptide-coated materials. |
author2 |
School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering |
author_facet |
School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering Jackman, Joshua Alexander Mochizuki, Masahito Oguchi, Masahiro Kim, Seong-Oh Ogawa, Tetsu Lkhamsuren, Ganchimeg Cho, Nam-Joon Hayashi, Tomohiro |
format |
Article |
author |
Jackman, Joshua Alexander Mochizuki, Masahito Oguchi, Masahiro Kim, Seong-Oh Ogawa, Tetsu Lkhamsuren, Ganchimeg Cho, Nam-Joon Hayashi, Tomohiro |
author_sort |
Jackman, Joshua Alexander |
title |
Quantitative Evaluation of Peptide–Material Interactions by a Force Mapping Method: Guidelines for Surface Modification |
title_short |
Quantitative Evaluation of Peptide–Material Interactions by a Force Mapping Method: Guidelines for Surface Modification |
title_full |
Quantitative Evaluation of Peptide–Material Interactions by a Force Mapping Method: Guidelines for Surface Modification |
title_fullStr |
Quantitative Evaluation of Peptide–Material Interactions by a Force Mapping Method: Guidelines for Surface Modification |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quantitative Evaluation of Peptide–Material Interactions by a Force Mapping Method: Guidelines for Surface Modification |
title_sort |
quantitative evaluation of peptide–material interactions by a force mapping method: guidelines for surface modification |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81108 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40648 |
_version_ |
1681058886907330560 |