Hollow microparticles as a superior delivery system over solid microparticles for the encapsulation of peptides
Purpose Peptides are gaining significant interests as therapeutic agents due to their high targeting specificity and potency. However, their low bioavailability and short half-lives limit their massive potential as therapeutics. The use of dense, solid particles of biodegradable polymer as a uni...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/82262 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48032 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | Purpose Peptides are gaining significant interests as therapeutic
agents due to their high targeting specificity and potency.
However, their low bioavailability and short half-lives limit
their massive potential as therapeutics. The use of dense, solid
particles of biodegradable polymer as a universal carrier for
peptides also has its challenges, such as inefficient peptide
release and low bioactivity. In this paper, it was established
that hollow microparticles (h-MPs) instead of solid microparticles
(s-MPs), as peptide carriers, could improve the release
efficiency, while better preserving their bioactivity.
Methods Glucagon like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) was encapsulated
as a model peptide. Mass loss, average molecular weight
changes, intraparticle pH, polymer-peptide interaction and
release studies, together with bioactivity assessment of the peptide
for s-MPs and h-MPs were systematically analyzed and
evaluated for efficacy.
Results The intraparticle pH of s-MPs was as low as 2.64
whereas the pH of h-MPs was 4.99 by day 7. Consequently,
93% of the peptide extracted from h-MPs was still bioactive
while only 58% of the peptide extracted from s-MPs was bioactive.
Likewise, the cumulative release of GLP-1 by day 14
from h-MPs showed a cumulative amount of 88 ± 8% as compared
to 33 ± 6% for s-MPs.
Conclusions The cumulative release of peptide can be significantly
improved, and the bioactivity can be better preserved
by simply using h-MPs instead of s-MPs as carriers |
---|