Quantifying the sources of ionosphere day‐to‐day variability

Simulations from the coupled Whole Atmosphere Model and Global Ionosphere Plasmasphere show significant day‐to‐day variations in total electron content (TEC) and the F region peak density (NmF2). The Whole Atmosphere Model‐Global Ionosphere Plasmasphere was driven by the auroral precipitation patter...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matsuo, Tomoko, Viereck, Rodney, Fang, Tzu‐Wei, Fuller‐Rowell, Tim, Yudin, Valery
Other Authors: School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/83149
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49108
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-83149
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-831492020-03-07T13:57:26Z Quantifying the sources of ionosphere day‐to‐day variability Matsuo, Tomoko Viereck, Rodney Fang, Tzu‐Wei Fuller‐Rowell, Tim Yudin, Valery School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Satellite Research Centre Ionosphere Variability Whole Atmosphere Modeling Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering Simulations from the coupled Whole Atmosphere Model and Global Ionosphere Plasmasphere show significant day‐to‐day variations in total electron content (TEC) and the F region peak density (NmF2). The Whole Atmosphere Model‐Global Ionosphere Plasmasphere was driven by the auroral precipitation patterns inferred from TIROS/NOAA, daily solar irradiance measurements derived from the satellite observations, and 5‐min interplanetary magnetic field/solar wind parameters during June and July 2012. Overall, the combination of solar, magnetosphere, and lower atmosphere drivers produced similar magnitude of variability consistent with that seen in observations. Results also show that the relative variability is much larger at night than in the daytime, due to much lower background density, and depended strongly on latitude and local time. Additional simulations were also performed to distinguish the contributions to the variability from solar activity, geomagnetic activity, and lower atmospheric perturbations. Results show that globally, geomagnetic activity is the main contributor to the NmF2 variability, followed by lower atmosphere perturbation, and then solar activity. For TEC variability, again, geomagnetic activity is the main contributor, followed by solar activity, and then lower atmosphere perturbation. In terms of absolute variability, at low latitudes solar activity dominates the TEC variability, most likely due to the importance of solar EUV driving the changes in ionosphere density through photoionization, while the contributions from the lower atmosphere and geomagnetic activity are almost equally. For the middle‐ and high‐latitude regions, the solar activity and geomagnetic activity are the most important sources for the TEC variability. Published version 2019-07-03T05:50:01Z 2019-12-06T15:12:46Z 2019-07-03T05:50:01Z 2019-12-06T15:12:46Z 2018 Journal Article Fang, T.-W, Fuller‐Rowell, T., Yudin, V., Matsuo, T., & Viereck, R. (2018). Quantifying the sources of ionosphere day‐to‐day variability. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 123(11), 9682-9696. doi:10.1029/2018JA025525 2169-9402 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/83149 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49108 10.1029/2018JA025525 en Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics © 2018 American Geophysical Union. All rights reserved. This paper was published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics and is made available with permission of American Geophysical Union. 15 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Ionosphere Variability
Whole Atmosphere Modeling
Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering
spellingShingle Ionosphere Variability
Whole Atmosphere Modeling
Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering
Matsuo, Tomoko
Viereck, Rodney
Fang, Tzu‐Wei
Fuller‐Rowell, Tim
Yudin, Valery
Quantifying the sources of ionosphere day‐to‐day variability
description Simulations from the coupled Whole Atmosphere Model and Global Ionosphere Plasmasphere show significant day‐to‐day variations in total electron content (TEC) and the F region peak density (NmF2). The Whole Atmosphere Model‐Global Ionosphere Plasmasphere was driven by the auroral precipitation patterns inferred from TIROS/NOAA, daily solar irradiance measurements derived from the satellite observations, and 5‐min interplanetary magnetic field/solar wind parameters during June and July 2012. Overall, the combination of solar, magnetosphere, and lower atmosphere drivers produced similar magnitude of variability consistent with that seen in observations. Results also show that the relative variability is much larger at night than in the daytime, due to much lower background density, and depended strongly on latitude and local time. Additional simulations were also performed to distinguish the contributions to the variability from solar activity, geomagnetic activity, and lower atmospheric perturbations. Results show that globally, geomagnetic activity is the main contributor to the NmF2 variability, followed by lower atmosphere perturbation, and then solar activity. For TEC variability, again, geomagnetic activity is the main contributor, followed by solar activity, and then lower atmosphere perturbation. In terms of absolute variability, at low latitudes solar activity dominates the TEC variability, most likely due to the importance of solar EUV driving the changes in ionosphere density through photoionization, while the contributions from the lower atmosphere and geomagnetic activity are almost equally. For the middle‐ and high‐latitude regions, the solar activity and geomagnetic activity are the most important sources for the TEC variability.
author2 School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
author_facet School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Matsuo, Tomoko
Viereck, Rodney
Fang, Tzu‐Wei
Fuller‐Rowell, Tim
Yudin, Valery
format Article
author Matsuo, Tomoko
Viereck, Rodney
Fang, Tzu‐Wei
Fuller‐Rowell, Tim
Yudin, Valery
author_sort Matsuo, Tomoko
title Quantifying the sources of ionosphere day‐to‐day variability
title_short Quantifying the sources of ionosphere day‐to‐day variability
title_full Quantifying the sources of ionosphere day‐to‐day variability
title_fullStr Quantifying the sources of ionosphere day‐to‐day variability
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying the sources of ionosphere day‐to‐day variability
title_sort quantifying the sources of ionosphere day‐to‐day variability
publishDate 2019
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/83149
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49108
_version_ 1681041443304505344