Comparison and contrast of Chinese curricula between China and Singapore: challenges and prospects

In this paper, Chinese curricula in the contexts of China and Singapore on primary level are compared and contrasted by both quantitative (Word Segmenter and Text Analyzer) and qualitative methods (in-depth thematic analysis). The research shows challenges for educational administrators, teachers an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huang, Min, Bond, Francis
Other Authors: School of Humanities and Social Sciences
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/83900
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/42880
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-83900
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-839002020-03-07T12:10:38Z Comparison and contrast of Chinese curricula between China and Singapore: challenges and prospects Huang, Min Bond, Francis School of Humanities and Social Sciences Chinese curriculum Comparison In this paper, Chinese curricula in the contexts of China and Singapore on primary level are compared and contrasted by both quantitative (Word Segmenter and Text Analyzer) and qualitative methods (in-depth thematic analysis). The research shows challenges for educational administrators, teachers and other professional staff in Chinese education on the aspects of applying information and communication technology, implementing individualized and autonomous teaching and learning, balancing different teaching objectives, understanding students’ cognitive and psychological varieties, readjusting teachers’ roles as organizer, facilitator and instructor, and aligning formative assessment and summative assessment. Meanwhile, the research also demonstrates and rationalizes the prospects of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) in Chinese teaching and the glocalization of Chinese curricula in the future. Further, the research will help people know more about diverse social linguistic contexts in China and Singapore, the different essence of first language (L1) and second language (L2) teaching, and the complexity and arduousness of language teaching in practice. MOE (Min. of Education, S’pore) Published version 2017-07-17T05:23:47Z 2019-12-06T15:34:12Z 2017-07-17T05:23:47Z 2019-12-06T15:34:12Z 2016 Journal Article Huang, M., & Bond, F. (2016). Comparison and contrast of Chinese curricula between China and Singapore: challenges and prospects. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(1), 17-. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/83900 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/42880 10.1186/s40862-016-0023-6 196869 en Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education © 2016 The Author(s). This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. 16 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Chinese curriculum
Comparison
spellingShingle Chinese curriculum
Comparison
Huang, Min
Bond, Francis
Comparison and contrast of Chinese curricula between China and Singapore: challenges and prospects
description In this paper, Chinese curricula in the contexts of China and Singapore on primary level are compared and contrasted by both quantitative (Word Segmenter and Text Analyzer) and qualitative methods (in-depth thematic analysis). The research shows challenges for educational administrators, teachers and other professional staff in Chinese education on the aspects of applying information and communication technology, implementing individualized and autonomous teaching and learning, balancing different teaching objectives, understanding students’ cognitive and psychological varieties, readjusting teachers’ roles as organizer, facilitator and instructor, and aligning formative assessment and summative assessment. Meanwhile, the research also demonstrates and rationalizes the prospects of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) in Chinese teaching and the glocalization of Chinese curricula in the future. Further, the research will help people know more about diverse social linguistic contexts in China and Singapore, the different essence of first language (L1) and second language (L2) teaching, and the complexity and arduousness of language teaching in practice.
author2 School of Humanities and Social Sciences
author_facet School of Humanities and Social Sciences
Huang, Min
Bond, Francis
format Article
author Huang, Min
Bond, Francis
author_sort Huang, Min
title Comparison and contrast of Chinese curricula between China and Singapore: challenges and prospects
title_short Comparison and contrast of Chinese curricula between China and Singapore: challenges and prospects
title_full Comparison and contrast of Chinese curricula between China and Singapore: challenges and prospects
title_fullStr Comparison and contrast of Chinese curricula between China and Singapore: challenges and prospects
title_full_unstemmed Comparison and contrast of Chinese curricula between China and Singapore: challenges and prospects
title_sort comparison and contrast of chinese curricula between china and singapore: challenges and prospects
publishDate 2017
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/83900
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/42880
_version_ 1681044463374303232