Estimating uncertainty in limit state capacities for reinforced concrete frame structures through pushover analysis

In seismic fragility and risk analysis, the definition of structural limit state (LS) capacities is of crucial importance. Traditionally, LS capacities are defined according to design code provisions or using deterministic pushover analysis without considering the inherent randomness of structural p...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
Main Authors: Yu, Xiaohui, Lu, Dagang, Li, Bing
其他作者: School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
格式: Article
語言:English
出版: 2016
主題:
在線閱讀:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/84541
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/41860
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
機構: Nanyang Technological University
語言: English
實物特徵
總結:In seismic fragility and risk analysis, the definition of structural limit state (LS) capacities is of crucial importance. Traditionally, LS capacities are defined according to design code provisions or using deterministic pushover analysis without considering the inherent randomness of structural parameters. To assess the effects of structural randomness on LS capacities, ten structural parameters that include material strengths and gravity loads are considered as random variables, and a probabilistic pushover method based on a correlation-controlled Latin hypercube sampling technique is used to estimate the uncertainties in LS capacities for four typical reinforced concrete frame buildings. A series of ten LSs are identified from the pushover curves based on the design-code-given thresholds and the available damage-controlled criteria. The obtained LS capacities are further represented by a lognormal model with the median mc and the dispersion βc. The results show that structural uncertainties have limited influence on mc for the LSs other than that near collapse. The commonly used assumption of βc between 0.25 and 0.30 overestimates the uncertainties in LS capacities for each individual building, but they are suitable for a building group with moderate damages. A low uncertainty as βc=0.1~0.15 is adequate for the LSs associated with slight damages of structures, while a large uncertainty as βc=0.40~0.45 is suggested for the LSs near collapse.