Material jetting additive manufacturing: An experimental study using designed metrological benchmarks

Additive manufacturing (AM) technique allows the creation of parts with a high degree of design complexity by building three-dimensional (3D) parts layer-by-layer. Many of the current restrictions of design for manufacturing (DFM) as well as design for assembly (DFA) are no longer applicable for AM...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yap, Yee Ling, Wang, Chengcheng, Sing, Swee Leong, Dikshit, Vishwesh, Yeong, Wai Yee, Wei, Jun
Other Authors: School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/86583
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/44113
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
Description
Summary:Additive manufacturing (AM) technique allows the creation of parts with a high degree of design complexity by building three-dimensional (3D) parts layer-by-layer. Many of the current restrictions of design for manufacturing (DFM) as well as design for assembly (DFA) are no longer applicable for AM due to the lack of needs for tooling. Instead, it is critical to establish the manufacturing limits and design guidelines to achieve optimal production outcomes. This can be achieved through manipulation of process parameters. The purpose of this paper is to establish a systematic methodology for investigating the process capability of material jetting AM techniques by using specially designed benchmark artifacts. In this study, three customized benchmarks were designed to characterize and establish the process capability of material jetting AM techniques. Each of the benchmarks was designed for different purposes. Using a benchmark, metrological studies were conducted to determine the effect of process parameters on the dimensional accuracy of fabricated part. The design limitations on special features such as thin walls and assembly-free parts fabricated using different build orientations were also evaluated.