Material jetting additive manufacturing: An experimental study using designed metrological benchmarks
Additive manufacturing (AM) technique allows the creation of parts with a high degree of design complexity by building three-dimensional (3D) parts layer-by-layer. Many of the current restrictions of design for manufacturing (DFM) as well as design for assembly (DFA) are no longer applicable for AM...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/86583 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/44113 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-86583 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-865832023-03-04T17:16:04Z Material jetting additive manufacturing: An experimental study using designed metrological benchmarks Yap, Yee Ling Wang, Chengcheng Sing, Swee Leong Dikshit, Vishwesh Yeong, Wai Yee Wei, Jun School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering A*STAR SIMTech Singapore Centre for 3D Printing 3D Printing Additive Manufacturing Additive manufacturing (AM) technique allows the creation of parts with a high degree of design complexity by building three-dimensional (3D) parts layer-by-layer. Many of the current restrictions of design for manufacturing (DFM) as well as design for assembly (DFA) are no longer applicable for AM due to the lack of needs for tooling. Instead, it is critical to establish the manufacturing limits and design guidelines to achieve optimal production outcomes. This can be achieved through manipulation of process parameters. The purpose of this paper is to establish a systematic methodology for investigating the process capability of material jetting AM techniques by using specially designed benchmark artifacts. In this study, three customized benchmarks were designed to characterize and establish the process capability of material jetting AM techniques. Each of the benchmarks was designed for different purposes. Using a benchmark, metrological studies were conducted to determine the effect of process parameters on the dimensional accuracy of fabricated part. The design limitations on special features such as thin walls and assembly-free parts fabricated using different build orientations were also evaluated. ASTAR (Agency for Sci., Tech. and Research, S’pore) Accepted version 2017-12-08T06:11:42Z 2019-12-06T16:25:14Z 2017-12-08T06:11:42Z 2019-12-06T16:25:14Z 2017 Journal Article Yap, Y. L., Wang, C., Sing, S. L., Dikshit, V., Yeong, W. Y., & Wei, J. (2017). Material jetting additive manufacturing: An experimental study using designed metrological benchmarks. Precision Engineering, 50, 275-285. 0141-6359 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/86583 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/44113 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.05.015 201279 en Precision Engineering © 2017 Elsevier Inc. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Precision Engineering, Elsevier Inc. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.05.015]. 39 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
3D Printing Additive Manufacturing |
spellingShingle |
3D Printing Additive Manufacturing Yap, Yee Ling Wang, Chengcheng Sing, Swee Leong Dikshit, Vishwesh Yeong, Wai Yee Wei, Jun Material jetting additive manufacturing: An experimental study using designed metrological benchmarks |
description |
Additive manufacturing (AM) technique allows the creation of parts with a high degree of design complexity by building three-dimensional (3D) parts layer-by-layer. Many of the current restrictions of design for manufacturing (DFM) as well as design for assembly (DFA) are no longer applicable for AM due to the lack of needs for tooling. Instead, it is critical to establish the manufacturing limits and design guidelines to achieve optimal production outcomes. This can be achieved through manipulation of process parameters.
The purpose of this paper is to establish a systematic methodology for investigating the process capability of material jetting AM techniques by using specially designed benchmark artifacts. In this study, three customized benchmarks were designed to characterize and establish the process capability of material jetting AM techniques. Each of the benchmarks was designed for different purposes. Using a benchmark, metrological studies were conducted to determine the effect of process parameters on the dimensional accuracy of fabricated part. The design limitations on special features such as thin walls and assembly-free parts fabricated using different build orientations were also evaluated. |
author2 |
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering |
author_facet |
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Yap, Yee Ling Wang, Chengcheng Sing, Swee Leong Dikshit, Vishwesh Yeong, Wai Yee Wei, Jun |
format |
Article |
author |
Yap, Yee Ling Wang, Chengcheng Sing, Swee Leong Dikshit, Vishwesh Yeong, Wai Yee Wei, Jun |
author_sort |
Yap, Yee Ling |
title |
Material jetting additive manufacturing: An experimental study using designed metrological benchmarks |
title_short |
Material jetting additive manufacturing: An experimental study using designed metrological benchmarks |
title_full |
Material jetting additive manufacturing: An experimental study using designed metrological benchmarks |
title_fullStr |
Material jetting additive manufacturing: An experimental study using designed metrological benchmarks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Material jetting additive manufacturing: An experimental study using designed metrological benchmarks |
title_sort |
material jetting additive manufacturing: an experimental study using designed metrological benchmarks |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/86583 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/44113 |
_version_ |
1759856609420378112 |