Multiple-Vector Model Predictive Power Control of Four-Switch Three-Phase Rectifiers with Capacitor Voltage Balancing

Model-predictive power control (MPPC) takes the switching nonlinearity of power converters and system constraints into consideration. It is a promising control technique for three-phase four-switch rectifiers (TPFSRs) because capacitor-voltage-balancing control and instantaneous power control can be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhou, Dehong, Li, Xiaoqiang, Tang, Yi
Other Authors: School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88772
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/44727
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-88772
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-887722020-03-07T14:02:36Z Multiple-Vector Model Predictive Power Control of Four-Switch Three-Phase Rectifiers with Capacitor Voltage Balancing Zhou, Dehong Li, Xiaoqiang Tang, Yi School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Maritime Institute Capacitor Voltage Balancing Three-phase Four-switch Rectifier (TPFSR) Model-predictive power control (MPPC) takes the switching nonlinearity of power converters and system constraints into consideration. It is a promising control technique for three-phase four-switch rectifiers (TPFSRs) because capacitor-voltage-balancing control and instantaneous power control can be simultaneously designed for this type of power converters. However, since only one switching vector is allowed in each control interval, conventional MPPC (C-MPPC) may lead to significant output power ripples that can severely degrade system power quality. This is particularly true for TPFSRs due to the limited number of switching states as well as the constraint imposed by the capacitor-voltage-balancing control. To improve the performance of TPFSRs, this paper proposes a multiple-vector MPPC scheme, which can minimize active power and reactive power ripples and achieve capacitor voltage balancing with a constant switching frequency. An equivalent zero-voltage vector model and a capacitor-voltage-balancing model are derived to implement the proposed control scheme. Comparative experimental results are presented to demonstrate the superiority of the proposed control scheme over the C-MPPC. Accepted version 2018-04-26T06:20:16Z 2019-12-06T17:10:37Z 2018-04-26T06:20:16Z 2019-12-06T17:10:37Z 2018 2017 Journal Article Zhou, D., Li, X., & Tang, Y. (2017). Multiple-Vector Model Predictive Power Control of Four-Switch Three-Phase Rectifiers with Capacitor Voltage Balancing. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 33(7), 5824 - 5835. 0885-8993 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88772 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/44727 10.1109/TPEL.2017.2750766 206307 en IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics © 2017 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2017.2750766]. 11 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Capacitor Voltage Balancing
Three-phase Four-switch Rectifier (TPFSR)
spellingShingle Capacitor Voltage Balancing
Three-phase Four-switch Rectifier (TPFSR)
Zhou, Dehong
Li, Xiaoqiang
Tang, Yi
Multiple-Vector Model Predictive Power Control of Four-Switch Three-Phase Rectifiers with Capacitor Voltage Balancing
description Model-predictive power control (MPPC) takes the switching nonlinearity of power converters and system constraints into consideration. It is a promising control technique for three-phase four-switch rectifiers (TPFSRs) because capacitor-voltage-balancing control and instantaneous power control can be simultaneously designed for this type of power converters. However, since only one switching vector is allowed in each control interval, conventional MPPC (C-MPPC) may lead to significant output power ripples that can severely degrade system power quality. This is particularly true for TPFSRs due to the limited number of switching states as well as the constraint imposed by the capacitor-voltage-balancing control. To improve the performance of TPFSRs, this paper proposes a multiple-vector MPPC scheme, which can minimize active power and reactive power ripples and achieve capacitor voltage balancing with a constant switching frequency. An equivalent zero-voltage vector model and a capacitor-voltage-balancing model are derived to implement the proposed control scheme. Comparative experimental results are presented to demonstrate the superiority of the proposed control scheme over the C-MPPC.
author2 School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
author_facet School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Zhou, Dehong
Li, Xiaoqiang
Tang, Yi
format Article
author Zhou, Dehong
Li, Xiaoqiang
Tang, Yi
author_sort Zhou, Dehong
title Multiple-Vector Model Predictive Power Control of Four-Switch Three-Phase Rectifiers with Capacitor Voltage Balancing
title_short Multiple-Vector Model Predictive Power Control of Four-Switch Three-Phase Rectifiers with Capacitor Voltage Balancing
title_full Multiple-Vector Model Predictive Power Control of Four-Switch Three-Phase Rectifiers with Capacitor Voltage Balancing
title_fullStr Multiple-Vector Model Predictive Power Control of Four-Switch Three-Phase Rectifiers with Capacitor Voltage Balancing
title_full_unstemmed Multiple-Vector Model Predictive Power Control of Four-Switch Three-Phase Rectifiers with Capacitor Voltage Balancing
title_sort multiple-vector model predictive power control of four-switch three-phase rectifiers with capacitor voltage balancing
publishDate 2018
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88772
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/44727
_version_ 1681035974372491264