Compared to dematerialized money, cash increases impatience in intertemporal choice

When it comes to trading time for money (or vice versa), people tend to be impatient and myopic. Often dramatically so. For illustration, half of people would rather collect $15 now than $30 in three months. This willingness to forego 50% of the reward to skip a 3‐month wait corresponds to an annual...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Duclos, Rod, Khamitov, Mansur
Other Authors: Nanyang Business School
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/89593
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49119
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-89593
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-895932023-05-19T06:44:43Z Compared to dematerialized money, cash increases impatience in intertemporal choice Duclos, Rod Khamitov, Mansur Nanyang Business School Intertemporal Choice Discounting DRNTU::Business::Marketing::Consumer behavior When it comes to trading time for money (or vice versa), people tend to be impatient and myopic. Often dramatically so. For illustration, half of people would rather collect $15 now than $30 in three months. This willingness to forego 50% of the reward to skip a 3‐month wait corresponds to an annual discount rate of 277%. This article investigates how money's physical form biases intertemporal choice. We ask, what happens to (im)patience (i.e., discount rates) when time is traded against cash rather than against an equivalent sum of dematerialized money? We find that intertemporal decisions pitting time against cash (rather than against dematerialized money) increase impatience. The underlying mechanism relates to the pain of parting from money. Letting go of cash (dematerialized money) we can have now is psychologically more (less) painful, which in turn reduces (increases) our willingness to wait for larger‐later payoffs. Importantly, heightening prevention focus (i.e., concerns for safety and security) moderates this bias. The article concludes by discussing the implications of the research, particularly for the psychology of saving behavior. Accepted version 2019-07-04T01:27:35Z 2019-12-06T17:29:09Z 2019-07-04T01:27:35Z 2019-12-06T17:29:09Z 2019 Journal Article Duclos, R., & Khamitov, M. (2019). Compared to dematerialized money, cash increases impatience in intertemporal choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(3), 445-454. doi:10.1002/jcpy.1098 1057-7408 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/89593 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49119 10.1002/jcpy.1098 en Journal of Consumer Psychology © 2019 Society for Consumer Psychology. All rights reserved. This paper was published by Elsevier in Journal of Consumer Psychology and is made available with permission of Society for Consumer Psychology. 30 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Intertemporal Choice
Discounting
DRNTU::Business::Marketing::Consumer behavior
spellingShingle Intertemporal Choice
Discounting
DRNTU::Business::Marketing::Consumer behavior
Duclos, Rod
Khamitov, Mansur
Compared to dematerialized money, cash increases impatience in intertemporal choice
description When it comes to trading time for money (or vice versa), people tend to be impatient and myopic. Often dramatically so. For illustration, half of people would rather collect $15 now than $30 in three months. This willingness to forego 50% of the reward to skip a 3‐month wait corresponds to an annual discount rate of 277%. This article investigates how money's physical form biases intertemporal choice. We ask, what happens to (im)patience (i.e., discount rates) when time is traded against cash rather than against an equivalent sum of dematerialized money? We find that intertemporal decisions pitting time against cash (rather than against dematerialized money) increase impatience. The underlying mechanism relates to the pain of parting from money. Letting go of cash (dematerialized money) we can have now is psychologically more (less) painful, which in turn reduces (increases) our willingness to wait for larger‐later payoffs. Importantly, heightening prevention focus (i.e., concerns for safety and security) moderates this bias. The article concludes by discussing the implications of the research, particularly for the psychology of saving behavior.
author2 Nanyang Business School
author_facet Nanyang Business School
Duclos, Rod
Khamitov, Mansur
format Article
author Duclos, Rod
Khamitov, Mansur
author_sort Duclos, Rod
title Compared to dematerialized money, cash increases impatience in intertemporal choice
title_short Compared to dematerialized money, cash increases impatience in intertemporal choice
title_full Compared to dematerialized money, cash increases impatience in intertemporal choice
title_fullStr Compared to dematerialized money, cash increases impatience in intertemporal choice
title_full_unstemmed Compared to dematerialized money, cash increases impatience in intertemporal choice
title_sort compared to dematerialized money, cash increases impatience in intertemporal choice
publishDate 2019
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/89593
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49119
_version_ 1770564818835603456