Cosolvent effects on the drug release and depot swelling in injectable in situ depot-forming systems

Although injectable depot-forming solutions have been commercialized, the factors that influence the overall release kinetics from such systems are still not fully understood. In this work, we address the effect of cosolvent on the issue of excessive burst release of potent bioactives from injectabl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liu, Hui, Venkatraman, Subbu S.
Other Authors: School of Materials Science & Engineering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/97951
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/17160
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-97951
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-979512020-06-01T10:01:45Z Cosolvent effects on the drug release and depot swelling in injectable in situ depot-forming systems Liu, Hui Venkatraman, Subbu S. School of Materials Science & Engineering DRNTU::Science::Medicine::Pharmacy::Pharmaceutical technology Although injectable depot-forming solutions have been commercialized, the factors that influence the overall release kinetics from such systems are still not fully understood. In this work, we address the effect of cosolvent on the issue of excessive burst release of potent bioactives from injectable depot-forming solutions. Specifically, we have evaluated the influence of addition of a relatively hydrophobic cosolvent (triacetin) to more hydrophilic biocompatible solvents such as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) on the burst release. Drug release and solvent release results demonstrate that high burst release that occurred when only hydrophilic solvent was used as solvent was significantly reduced by adding triacetin as a cosolvent. The profiles of drug release were in good agreement with the profiles of the hydrophilic solvent DMSO or NMP release, and the suppression of the burst by triacetin addition is due to the suppression of the solvent release. Surprisingly, the swelling of the depot increased with triacetin amount and the depot morphology became more porous compared with the absence of triacetin. Usage of hydrophobic solvent as a cosolvent to reduce the burst release was shown to be more effective on the hydrophobic PdlLA depot and less effective on the relatively hydrophilic RG502 depot. 2013-10-31T07:55:43Z 2019-12-06T19:48:42Z 2013-10-31T07:55:43Z 2019-12-06T19:48:42Z 2012 2012 Journal Article Liu, H., & Venkatraman, S. S. (2012). Cosolvent effects on the drug release and depot swelling in injectable in situ depot-forming systems. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 101(5), 1783-1793. 0022-3549 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/97951 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/17160 10.1002/jps.23065 en Journal of pharmaceutical sciences
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Science::Medicine::Pharmacy::Pharmaceutical technology
spellingShingle DRNTU::Science::Medicine::Pharmacy::Pharmaceutical technology
Liu, Hui
Venkatraman, Subbu S.
Cosolvent effects on the drug release and depot swelling in injectable in situ depot-forming systems
description Although injectable depot-forming solutions have been commercialized, the factors that influence the overall release kinetics from such systems are still not fully understood. In this work, we address the effect of cosolvent on the issue of excessive burst release of potent bioactives from injectable depot-forming solutions. Specifically, we have evaluated the influence of addition of a relatively hydrophobic cosolvent (triacetin) to more hydrophilic biocompatible solvents such as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) on the burst release. Drug release and solvent release results demonstrate that high burst release that occurred when only hydrophilic solvent was used as solvent was significantly reduced by adding triacetin as a cosolvent. The profiles of drug release were in good agreement with the profiles of the hydrophilic solvent DMSO or NMP release, and the suppression of the burst by triacetin addition is due to the suppression of the solvent release. Surprisingly, the swelling of the depot increased with triacetin amount and the depot morphology became more porous compared with the absence of triacetin. Usage of hydrophobic solvent as a cosolvent to reduce the burst release was shown to be more effective on the hydrophobic PdlLA depot and less effective on the relatively hydrophilic RG502 depot.
author2 School of Materials Science & Engineering
author_facet School of Materials Science & Engineering
Liu, Hui
Venkatraman, Subbu S.
format Article
author Liu, Hui
Venkatraman, Subbu S.
author_sort Liu, Hui
title Cosolvent effects on the drug release and depot swelling in injectable in situ depot-forming systems
title_short Cosolvent effects on the drug release and depot swelling in injectable in situ depot-forming systems
title_full Cosolvent effects on the drug release and depot swelling in injectable in situ depot-forming systems
title_fullStr Cosolvent effects on the drug release and depot swelling in injectable in situ depot-forming systems
title_full_unstemmed Cosolvent effects on the drug release and depot swelling in injectable in situ depot-forming systems
title_sort cosolvent effects on the drug release and depot swelling in injectable in situ depot-forming systems
publishDate 2013
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/97951
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/17160
_version_ 1681056323027861504