∑2 induction and infinite injury priority arguments, part III: Prompt sets, minimal pairs and shoenfield's conjecture
Israel Journal of Mathematics
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Chong, C.T., Qian, L., Slaman, T.A., Yang, Y. |
---|---|
Other Authors: | MATHEMATICS |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
2014
|
Online Access: | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/102602 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | National University of Singapore |
Similar Items
-
∑2 Induction and infinite injury priority argument, Part I: Maximal sets and the jump operator
by: Chong, C.T., et al.
Published: (2014) -
Σ2 induction and infinite injury priority arguments, Part II Tame Σ2 coding and the jump operator
by: Chong, C.T., et al.
Published: (2014) -
Prompt for extraction? PAIE: Prompting Argument Interaction for Event Argument Extraction
by: MA, Yubo, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Justified Belief and the Infinite Regress Argument
by: WILLIAMS, John N.
Published: (1981) -
Π11-conservation of combinatorial principles weaker than Ramsey's theorem for pairs
by: Chong, C.T., et al.
Published: (2014)