Vaginal birth after caesarean section: Why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's accounts of their birth choices

Vaginal birth after caesarean section: Why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's accounts of their birth choices

10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008881

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Black, M, Entwistle, V.A, Bhattacharya, S, Gillies, K
Other Authors:	DEAN'S OFFICE (MEDICINE)
Format:	Article
Published:	BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Subjects:	Article attitude to health birth cesarean section ethnographic research human meta analysis qualitative research social behavior systematic review vaginal delivery Australia China cultural anthropology female patient participation patient preference pregnancy psychology repeat cesarean section statistics and numerical data United Kingdom United States vaginal birth after cesarean Anthropology, Cultural Cesarean Section, Repeat Female Humans Patient Participation Patient Preference Pregnancy Qualitative Research Vaginal Birth after Cesarean
Online Access:	https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/180397
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution:	National University of Singapore

Description
Summary:	10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008881