Vaginal birth after caesarean section: Why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's accounts of their birth choices

10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008881

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Black, M, Entwistle, V.A, Bhattacharya, S, Gillies, K
Other Authors:	DEAN'S OFFICE (MEDICINE)
Format:	Article
Published:	BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Subjects:	Article attitude to health birth cesarean section ethnographic research human meta analysis qualitative research social behavior systematic review vaginal delivery Australia China cultural anthropology female patient participation patient preference pregnancy psychology repeat cesarean section statistics and numerical data United Kingdom United States vaginal birth after cesarean Anthropology, Cultural Cesarean Section, Repeat Female Humans Patient Participation Patient Preference Pregnancy Qualitative Research Vaginal Birth after Cesarean
Online Access:	https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/180397
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution:	National University of Singapore

id	sg-nus-scholar.10635-180397
record_format	dspace
spelling	sg-nus-scholar.10635-1803972023-11-01T08:19:50Z Vaginal birth after caesarean section: Why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's accounts of their birth choices Black, M Entwistle, V.A Bhattacharya, S Gillies, K DEAN'S OFFICE (MEDICINE) Article attitude to health birth cesarean section ethnographic research human meta analysis qualitative research social behavior systematic review vaginal delivery Australia China cultural anthropology female patient participation patient preference pregnancy psychology repeat cesarean section statistics and numerical data United Kingdom United States vaginal birth after cesarean Anthropology, Cultural Australia Cesarean Section, Repeat China Female Humans Patient Participation Patient Preference Pregnancy Qualitative Research United Kingdom United States Vaginal Birth after Cesarean 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008881 BMJ Open 6 1 e008881 2020-10-26T08:47:59Z 2020-10-26T08:47:59Z 2016 Article Black, M, Entwistle, V.A, Bhattacharya, S, Gillies, K (2016). Vaginal birth after caesarean section: Why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's accounts of their birth choices. BMJ Open 6 (1) : e008881. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008881 2044-6055 https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/180397 Attribution 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ BMJ Publishing Group Unpaywall 20201031
institution	National University of Singapore
building	NUS Library
continent	Asia
country	Singapore Singapore
content_provider	NUS Library
collection	ScholarBank@NUS
topic	Article attitude to health birth cesarean section ethnographic research human meta analysis qualitative research social behavior systematic review vaginal delivery Australia China cultural anthropology female patient participation patient preference pregnancy psychology repeat cesarean section statistics and numerical data United Kingdom United States vaginal birth after cesarean Anthropology, Cultural Australia Cesarean Section, Repeat China Female Humans Patient Participation Patient Preference Pregnancy Qualitative Research United Kingdom United States Vaginal Birth after Cesarean
spellingShingle	Article attitude to health birth cesarean section ethnographic research human meta analysis qualitative research social behavior systematic review vaginal delivery Australia China cultural anthropology female patient participation patient preference pregnancy psychology repeat cesarean section statistics and numerical data United Kingdom United States vaginal birth after cesarean Anthropology, Cultural Australia Cesarean Section, Repeat China Female Humans Patient Participation Patient Preference Pregnancy Qualitative Research United Kingdom United States Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Black, M Entwistle, V.A Bhattacharya, S Gillies, K Vaginal birth after caesarean section: Why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's accounts of their birth choices
description	10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008881
author2	DEAN'S OFFICE (MEDICINE)
author_facet	DEAN'S OFFICE (MEDICINE) Black, M Entwistle, V.A Bhattacharya, S Gillies, K
format	Article
author	Black, M Entwistle, V.A Bhattacharya, S Gillies, K
author_sort	Black, M
title	Vaginal birth after caesarean section: Why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's accounts of their birth choices
title_short	Vaginal birth after caesarean section: Why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's accounts of their birth choices
title_full	Vaginal birth after caesarean section: Why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's accounts of their birth choices
title_fullStr	Vaginal birth after caesarean section: Why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's accounts of their birth choices
title_full_unstemmed	Vaginal birth after caesarean section: Why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's accounts of their birth choices
title_sort	vaginal birth after caesarean section: why is uptake so low? insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's accounts of their birth choices
publisher	BMJ Publishing Group
publishDate	2020
url	https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/180397
_version_	1781792381957308416

Vaginal birth after caesarean section: Why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's accounts of their birth choices

Similar Items