Points of contention: Qualitative research identifying where researchers and research ethics committees disagree about consent waivers for secondary research with tissue and data
10.1371/journal.pone.0235618
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
| Online Access: | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/197632 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | National University of Singapore |
| id |
sg-nus-scholar.10635-197632 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
sg-nus-scholar.10635-1976322024-11-10T23:48:54Z Points of contention: Qualitative research identifying where researchers and research ethics committees disagree about consent waivers for secondary research with tissue and data Ballantyne, A. Moore, A. Bartholomew, K. Aagaard, N. DEAN'S OFFICE (MEDICINE) 10.1371/journal.pone.0235618 PLoS ONE 15 8-Aug e0235618 2021-08-18T03:36:11Z 2021-08-18T03:36:11Z 2020 Article Ballantyne, A., Moore, A., Bartholomew, K., Aagaard, N. (2020). Points of contention: Qualitative research identifying where researchers and research ethics committees disagree about consent waivers for secondary research with tissue and data. PLoS ONE 15 (8-Aug) : e0235618. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235618 19326203 https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/197632 Attribution 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Public Library of Science Scopus OA2020 |
| institution |
National University of Singapore |
| building |
NUS Library |
| continent |
Asia |
| country |
Singapore Singapore |
| content_provider |
NUS Library |
| collection |
ScholarBank@NUS |
| description |
10.1371/journal.pone.0235618 |
| author2 |
DEAN'S OFFICE (MEDICINE) |
| author_facet |
DEAN'S OFFICE (MEDICINE) Ballantyne, A. Moore, A. Bartholomew, K. Aagaard, N. |
| format |
Article |
| author |
Ballantyne, A. Moore, A. Bartholomew, K. Aagaard, N. |
| spellingShingle |
Ballantyne, A. Moore, A. Bartholomew, K. Aagaard, N. Points of contention: Qualitative research identifying where researchers and research ethics committees disagree about consent waivers for secondary research with tissue and data |
| author_sort |
Ballantyne, A. |
| title |
Points of contention: Qualitative research identifying where researchers and research ethics committees disagree about consent waivers for secondary research with tissue and data |
| title_short |
Points of contention: Qualitative research identifying where researchers and research ethics committees disagree about consent waivers for secondary research with tissue and data |
| title_full |
Points of contention: Qualitative research identifying where researchers and research ethics committees disagree about consent waivers for secondary research with tissue and data |
| title_fullStr |
Points of contention: Qualitative research identifying where researchers and research ethics committees disagree about consent waivers for secondary research with tissue and data |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Points of contention: Qualitative research identifying where researchers and research ethics committees disagree about consent waivers for secondary research with tissue and data |
| title_sort |
points of contention: qualitative research identifying where researchers and research ethics committees disagree about consent waivers for secondary research with tissue and data |
| publisher |
Public Library of Science |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/197632 |
| _version_ |
1821207199927500800 |