Germline genome editing: Moratorium, hard law, or an informed adaptive consensus?
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009742
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Kaan, Terry, Xafis, Vicki, Schaefer, G Owen, Zhu, Yujia, Labude, Markus K, Chadwick, Ruth |
---|---|
Other Authors: | DEAN'S OFFICE (MEDICINE) |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/228272 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | National University of Singapore |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Vulnerability and the Ethics of Human Germline Genome Editing
by: Labude, Markus K, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Germline genome modification through novel political, ethical, and social lenses
by: Xafis, V, et al.
Published: (2021) -
International Reporting Mechanism for Unethical Germline Gene Editing Experiments Is Needed
by: Schaefer, G.O., et al.
Published: (2022) -
CRISPR AND GERMLINE EDITING CLINICAL TRIALS
by: ZHU YUJIA
Published: (2019) -
Correction: Landscape of germline pathogenic variants in patients with dual primary breast and lung cancer (vol 17, 66, 2023)
by: Lee, Ning-Yuan, et al.
Published: (2024)