Reward structures and negotiation strategies: The use of deception in negotiation

This present study investigated the effect of outcome interdependence on different types of deceptions – mutually beneficial and self-interested deception, in a negotiation context. 150 SMU students were recruited to engage in a negotiation task and were randomly assigned to either a high outcome in...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
主要作者: LIM, Jermaine Pin Xiu
格式: text
語言:English
出版: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2021
主題:
在線閱讀:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/etd_coll/379
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1376&context=etd_coll
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
機構: Singapore Management University
語言: English
id sg-smu-ink.etd_coll-1376
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.etd_coll-13762022-03-01T06:28:44Z Reward structures and negotiation strategies: The use of deception in negotiation LIM, Jermaine Pin Xiu This present study investigated the effect of outcome interdependence on different types of deceptions – mutually beneficial and self-interested deception, in a negotiation context. 150 SMU students were recruited to engage in a negotiation task and were randomly assigned to either a high outcome interdependence condition where the monetary reward was awarded based on the points scored by the dyad or a low outcome interdependence condition where the monetary reward was awarded based on the points scored by the individual. The results showed that in a self-rated scale, dyads in the low outcome interdependence condition rated themselves to have engaged in more mutually beneficial and self-interested deception compared to dyads in the high outcome interdependence condition. Similarly, when two blind raters were asked to code the chat for deception, they found that dyads in the low outcome interdependence engaged in more mutually beneficial and self-interested deception, though the former was not statistically significant. Further research is required to examine if outcome interdependence could potentially have a similar effect on other types of deception (e.g. emotional deception) or if the effects would hold across different mediums (e.g. face-to-face vs online). 2021-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/etd_coll/379 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1376&context=etd_coll http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Dissertations and Theses Collection (Open Access) eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Deception mutually beneficial deception self-interested outcome interdependence negotiation Social Psychology Social Psychology and Interaction
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Deception
mutually beneficial deception
self-interested
outcome interdependence
negotiation
Social Psychology
Social Psychology and Interaction
spellingShingle Deception
mutually beneficial deception
self-interested
outcome interdependence
negotiation
Social Psychology
Social Psychology and Interaction
LIM, Jermaine Pin Xiu
Reward structures and negotiation strategies: The use of deception in negotiation
description This present study investigated the effect of outcome interdependence on different types of deceptions – mutually beneficial and self-interested deception, in a negotiation context. 150 SMU students were recruited to engage in a negotiation task and were randomly assigned to either a high outcome interdependence condition where the monetary reward was awarded based on the points scored by the dyad or a low outcome interdependence condition where the monetary reward was awarded based on the points scored by the individual. The results showed that in a self-rated scale, dyads in the low outcome interdependence condition rated themselves to have engaged in more mutually beneficial and self-interested deception compared to dyads in the high outcome interdependence condition. Similarly, when two blind raters were asked to code the chat for deception, they found that dyads in the low outcome interdependence engaged in more mutually beneficial and self-interested deception, though the former was not statistically significant. Further research is required to examine if outcome interdependence could potentially have a similar effect on other types of deception (e.g. emotional deception) or if the effects would hold across different mediums (e.g. face-to-face vs online).
format text
author LIM, Jermaine Pin Xiu
author_facet LIM, Jermaine Pin Xiu
author_sort LIM, Jermaine Pin Xiu
title Reward structures and negotiation strategies: The use of deception in negotiation
title_short Reward structures and negotiation strategies: The use of deception in negotiation
title_full Reward structures and negotiation strategies: The use of deception in negotiation
title_fullStr Reward structures and negotiation strategies: The use of deception in negotiation
title_full_unstemmed Reward structures and negotiation strategies: The use of deception in negotiation
title_sort reward structures and negotiation strategies: the use of deception in negotiation
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2021
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/etd_coll/379
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1376&context=etd_coll
_version_ 1745575013814108160