The cost of cheap talk: How campaign promises and default contributions affect donation-based crowd funding Success.

Non-profit organisations (NPOs) find it increasingly harder to engage donors and raise funds from the public. Post-pandemic: the emphasis on tactics to raise funds online through donation-based crowdfunding (DCF) platforms has surged in importance for both NPO survival and continued beneficiary aid....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: QIU, Tianci Leon
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/etd_coll/532
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/etd_coll/article/1530/viewcontent/GPGM_AY2019_PhD_QIU_TIANCI__LEON.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.etd_coll-1530
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.etd_coll-15302024-02-14T06:42:18Z The cost of cheap talk: How campaign promises and default contributions affect donation-based crowd funding Success. QIU, Tianci Leon Non-profit organisations (NPOs) find it increasingly harder to engage donors and raise funds from the public. Post-pandemic: the emphasis on tactics to raise funds online through donation-based crowdfunding (DCF) platforms has surged in importance for both NPO survival and continued beneficiary aid. However, unlike equity-based crowdfunding platforms where campaign organisers are obligated to provide investors with tangible returns based on funding milestones, NPOs on DCF platforms do not have to adhere to any funding milestones or are beholden to any tangible obligations towards donors. Consequently, NPOs are greatly incentivised to deploy cheap talk – non-binding, unverifiable messages and claims to persuade donors to give, thereby increase chances of crowding funding success. Specifically, we hypothesize that the rhetoric-based cheap talk of making campaign promises has a positive impact on funds raised, whereas the quantifiable cheap talk associated with suggesting high default contributions has a negative impact on funds raised. We also purport a positive interaction effect to exist between these two facets of cheap talk. Our empirical study based on campaign data from Singapore’s largest DCF platform supports these arguments. 2023-09-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/etd_coll/532 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/etd_coll/article/1530/viewcontent/GPGM_AY2019_PhD_QIU_TIANCI__LEON.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Dissertations and Theses Collection (Open Access) eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University donation-based crowd funding signaling theory campaign promises default contributions cheap talk Finance Finance and Financial Management
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic donation-based crowd funding
signaling theory
campaign promises
default contributions
cheap talk
Finance
Finance and Financial Management
spellingShingle donation-based crowd funding
signaling theory
campaign promises
default contributions
cheap talk
Finance
Finance and Financial Management
QIU, Tianci Leon
The cost of cheap talk: How campaign promises and default contributions affect donation-based crowd funding Success.
description Non-profit organisations (NPOs) find it increasingly harder to engage donors and raise funds from the public. Post-pandemic: the emphasis on tactics to raise funds online through donation-based crowdfunding (DCF) platforms has surged in importance for both NPO survival and continued beneficiary aid. However, unlike equity-based crowdfunding platforms where campaign organisers are obligated to provide investors with tangible returns based on funding milestones, NPOs on DCF platforms do not have to adhere to any funding milestones or are beholden to any tangible obligations towards donors. Consequently, NPOs are greatly incentivised to deploy cheap talk – non-binding, unverifiable messages and claims to persuade donors to give, thereby increase chances of crowding funding success. Specifically, we hypothesize that the rhetoric-based cheap talk of making campaign promises has a positive impact on funds raised, whereas the quantifiable cheap talk associated with suggesting high default contributions has a negative impact on funds raised. We also purport a positive interaction effect to exist between these two facets of cheap talk. Our empirical study based on campaign data from Singapore’s largest DCF platform supports these arguments.
format text
author QIU, Tianci Leon
author_facet QIU, Tianci Leon
author_sort QIU, Tianci Leon
title The cost of cheap talk: How campaign promises and default contributions affect donation-based crowd funding Success.
title_short The cost of cheap talk: How campaign promises and default contributions affect donation-based crowd funding Success.
title_full The cost of cheap talk: How campaign promises and default contributions affect donation-based crowd funding Success.
title_fullStr The cost of cheap talk: How campaign promises and default contributions affect donation-based crowd funding Success.
title_full_unstemmed The cost of cheap talk: How campaign promises and default contributions affect donation-based crowd funding Success.
title_sort cost of cheap talk: how campaign promises and default contributions affect donation-based crowd funding success.
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2023
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/etd_coll/532
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/etd_coll/article/1530/viewcontent/GPGM_AY2019_PhD_QIU_TIANCI__LEON.pdf
_version_ 1794549505860829184