The cost of cheap talk: How campaign promises and default contributions affect donation-based crowd funding Success.
Non-profit organisations (NPOs) find it increasingly harder to engage donors and raise funds from the public. Post-pandemic: the emphasis on tactics to raise funds online through donation-based crowdfunding (DCF) platforms has surged in importance for both NPO survival and continued beneficiary aid....
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/etd_coll/532 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/etd_coll/article/1530/viewcontent/GPGM_AY2019_PhD_QIU_TIANCI__LEON.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.etd_coll-1530 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.etd_coll-15302024-02-14T06:42:18Z The cost of cheap talk: How campaign promises and default contributions affect donation-based crowd funding Success. QIU, Tianci Leon Non-profit organisations (NPOs) find it increasingly harder to engage donors and raise funds from the public. Post-pandemic: the emphasis on tactics to raise funds online through donation-based crowdfunding (DCF) platforms has surged in importance for both NPO survival and continued beneficiary aid. However, unlike equity-based crowdfunding platforms where campaign organisers are obligated to provide investors with tangible returns based on funding milestones, NPOs on DCF platforms do not have to adhere to any funding milestones or are beholden to any tangible obligations towards donors. Consequently, NPOs are greatly incentivised to deploy cheap talk – non-binding, unverifiable messages and claims to persuade donors to give, thereby increase chances of crowding funding success. Specifically, we hypothesize that the rhetoric-based cheap talk of making campaign promises has a positive impact on funds raised, whereas the quantifiable cheap talk associated with suggesting high default contributions has a negative impact on funds raised. We also purport a positive interaction effect to exist between these two facets of cheap talk. Our empirical study based on campaign data from Singapore’s largest DCF platform supports these arguments. 2023-09-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/etd_coll/532 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/etd_coll/article/1530/viewcontent/GPGM_AY2019_PhD_QIU_TIANCI__LEON.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Dissertations and Theses Collection (Open Access) eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University donation-based crowd funding signaling theory campaign promises default contributions cheap talk Finance Finance and Financial Management |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
donation-based crowd funding signaling theory campaign promises default contributions cheap talk Finance Finance and Financial Management |
spellingShingle |
donation-based crowd funding signaling theory campaign promises default contributions cheap talk Finance Finance and Financial Management QIU, Tianci Leon The cost of cheap talk: How campaign promises and default contributions affect donation-based crowd funding Success. |
description |
Non-profit organisations (NPOs) find it increasingly harder to engage donors and raise funds from the public. Post-pandemic: the emphasis on tactics to raise funds online through donation-based crowdfunding (DCF) platforms has surged in importance for both NPO survival and continued beneficiary aid. However, unlike equity-based crowdfunding platforms where campaign organisers are obligated to provide investors with tangible returns based on funding milestones, NPOs on DCF platforms do not have to adhere to any funding milestones or are beholden to any tangible obligations towards donors. Consequently, NPOs are greatly incentivised to deploy cheap talk – non-binding, unverifiable messages and claims to persuade donors to give, thereby increase chances of crowding funding success. Specifically, we hypothesize that the rhetoric-based cheap talk of making campaign promises has a positive impact on funds raised, whereas the quantifiable cheap talk associated with suggesting high default contributions has a negative impact on funds raised. We also purport a positive interaction effect to exist between these two facets of cheap talk. Our empirical study based on campaign data from Singapore’s largest DCF platform supports these arguments. |
format |
text |
author |
QIU, Tianci Leon |
author_facet |
QIU, Tianci Leon |
author_sort |
QIU, Tianci Leon |
title |
The cost of cheap talk: How campaign promises and default contributions affect donation-based crowd funding Success. |
title_short |
The cost of cheap talk: How campaign promises and default contributions affect donation-based crowd funding Success. |
title_full |
The cost of cheap talk: How campaign promises and default contributions affect donation-based crowd funding Success. |
title_fullStr |
The cost of cheap talk: How campaign promises and default contributions affect donation-based crowd funding Success. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The cost of cheap talk: How campaign promises and default contributions affect donation-based crowd funding Success. |
title_sort |
cost of cheap talk: how campaign promises and default contributions affect donation-based crowd funding success. |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/etd_coll/532 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/etd_coll/article/1530/viewcontent/GPGM_AY2019_PhD_QIU_TIANCI__LEON.pdf |
_version_ |
1794549505860829184 |