Cross Sectional Variation of the Effect of Bond Rating Changes on Stock Prices

Previous research has found that the stock market reacts negatively to bond rating downgrades and that downgrades tend to follow periods of negative returns, indicating that at least some downgrades are partially predictable. Hypothesizing that the reaction to a downgrade depends on both the implica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: GOH, Jeremy C., EDERINGTON, Louis H.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 1999
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/1271
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/2270/viewcontent/Cross_Sectional_Variation_1999_pv.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-2270
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-22702021-04-15T04:31:58Z Cross Sectional Variation of the Effect of Bond Rating Changes on Stock Prices GOH, Jeremy C. EDERINGTON, Louis H. Previous research has found that the stock market reacts negatively to bond rating downgrades and that downgrades tend to follow periods of negative returns, indicating that at least some downgrades are partially predictable. Hypothesizing that the reaction to a downgrade depends on both the implications for cash flows and the degree of surprise, we explore how the reaction to downgrade announcements varies across bond issues. We find that the equity market reacts much more negatively to bond rating downgrades to and within the speculative bond category than to downgrades within the investment grade category. Within the speculative category, the reaction is stronger, the lower the old and new ratings are. The reaction to multiple-level downgrades is not very different from that to single-level downgrades. The market reaction is also stronger if the firm has experienced negative pre-downgrade abnormal returns. Our evidence indicates that downgrades are viewed by the market as providing information on likely future earnings before interest charges, not just likely future interest charges. It is also consistent with Billett's (1996) hypothesis that low rated debt makes a firm less attractive as a takeover target. 1999-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/1271 info:doi/10.1016/s1062-9769(99)80006-4 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/2270/viewcontent/Cross_Sectional_Variation_1999_pv.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Business Corporate Finance Portfolio and Security Analysis
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Business
Corporate Finance
Portfolio and Security Analysis
spellingShingle Business
Corporate Finance
Portfolio and Security Analysis
GOH, Jeremy C.
EDERINGTON, Louis H.
Cross Sectional Variation of the Effect of Bond Rating Changes on Stock Prices
description Previous research has found that the stock market reacts negatively to bond rating downgrades and that downgrades tend to follow periods of negative returns, indicating that at least some downgrades are partially predictable. Hypothesizing that the reaction to a downgrade depends on both the implications for cash flows and the degree of surprise, we explore how the reaction to downgrade announcements varies across bond issues. We find that the equity market reacts much more negatively to bond rating downgrades to and within the speculative bond category than to downgrades within the investment grade category. Within the speculative category, the reaction is stronger, the lower the old and new ratings are. The reaction to multiple-level downgrades is not very different from that to single-level downgrades. The market reaction is also stronger if the firm has experienced negative pre-downgrade abnormal returns. Our evidence indicates that downgrades are viewed by the market as providing information on likely future earnings before interest charges, not just likely future interest charges. It is also consistent with Billett's (1996) hypothesis that low rated debt makes a firm less attractive as a takeover target.
format text
author GOH, Jeremy C.
EDERINGTON, Louis H.
author_facet GOH, Jeremy C.
EDERINGTON, Louis H.
author_sort GOH, Jeremy C.
title Cross Sectional Variation of the Effect of Bond Rating Changes on Stock Prices
title_short Cross Sectional Variation of the Effect of Bond Rating Changes on Stock Prices
title_full Cross Sectional Variation of the Effect of Bond Rating Changes on Stock Prices
title_fullStr Cross Sectional Variation of the Effect of Bond Rating Changes on Stock Prices
title_full_unstemmed Cross Sectional Variation of the Effect of Bond Rating Changes on Stock Prices
title_sort cross sectional variation of the effect of bond rating changes on stock prices
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 1999
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/1271
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/2270/viewcontent/Cross_Sectional_Variation_1999_pv.pdf
_version_ 1770569856615186432