Entry Barriers: A Dull-, One-, or Two-Edged Sword for Incumbents? Unraveling the Paradox from a Contingency Perspective
The long-held precept of equating entry barriers with sustainable incumbent advantage increasingly is met with skepticism as incidents of innovative late entrants leapfrogging over market incumbents become more pervasive across industries. Ostensibly, the reassessment of the traditional assumptions...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2001
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2143 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3203402 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-3142 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-31422016-03-25T13:14:46Z Entry Barriers: A Dull-, One-, or Two-Edged Sword for Incumbents? Unraveling the Paradox from a Contingency Perspective HAN, Jin K. KIM, Namwoon KIM, Hong-Bumm The long-held precept of equating entry barriers with sustainable incumbent advantage increasingly is met with skepticism as incidents of innovative late entrants leapfrogging over market incumbents become more pervasive across industries. Ostensibly, the reassessment of the traditional assumptions underlying entry barrier strategy has become imperative; to this end, a study presents a framework that investigates the contingent effects of incumbents' barrier building on their own performance. Specifically, the study examines 5 types of entry barriers (capital requirements, cost advantages, switching costs, distribution access, and proprietary assets) for the nature of their impact in the following presupposed yet unresolved roles: as effectual versus ineffectual entry deterrents and as enablers versus inhibitors of incumbents' innovativeness. In addition, the study takes other variables into account to identify the contingencies of the framework. Using data from Korean consumer product industries, the study empirically tests and substantiates the variable impact of entry barriers on incumbents' performance. 2001-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2143 info:doi/10.1509/jmkg.65.1.1.18133 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3203402 Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University entry barriers contingency effects firm performance incumbent advantage switching costs Business Marketing |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
entry barriers contingency effects firm performance incumbent advantage switching costs Business Marketing |
spellingShingle |
entry barriers contingency effects firm performance incumbent advantage switching costs Business Marketing HAN, Jin K. KIM, Namwoon KIM, Hong-Bumm Entry Barriers: A Dull-, One-, or Two-Edged Sword for Incumbents? Unraveling the Paradox from a Contingency Perspective |
description |
The long-held precept of equating entry barriers with sustainable incumbent advantage increasingly is met with skepticism as incidents of innovative late entrants leapfrogging over market incumbents become more pervasive across industries. Ostensibly, the reassessment of the traditional assumptions underlying entry barrier strategy has become imperative; to this end, a study presents a framework that investigates the contingent effects of incumbents' barrier building on their own performance. Specifically, the study examines 5 types of entry barriers (capital requirements, cost advantages, switching costs, distribution access, and proprietary assets) for the nature of their impact in the following presupposed yet unresolved roles: as effectual versus ineffectual entry deterrents and as enablers versus inhibitors of incumbents' innovativeness. In addition, the study takes other variables into account to identify the contingencies of the framework. Using data from Korean consumer product industries, the study empirically tests and substantiates the variable impact of entry barriers on incumbents' performance. |
format |
text |
author |
HAN, Jin K. KIM, Namwoon KIM, Hong-Bumm |
author_facet |
HAN, Jin K. KIM, Namwoon KIM, Hong-Bumm |
author_sort |
HAN, Jin K. |
title |
Entry Barriers: A Dull-, One-, or Two-Edged Sword for Incumbents? Unraveling the Paradox from a Contingency Perspective |
title_short |
Entry Barriers: A Dull-, One-, or Two-Edged Sword for Incumbents? Unraveling the Paradox from a Contingency Perspective |
title_full |
Entry Barriers: A Dull-, One-, or Two-Edged Sword for Incumbents? Unraveling the Paradox from a Contingency Perspective |
title_fullStr |
Entry Barriers: A Dull-, One-, or Two-Edged Sword for Incumbents? Unraveling the Paradox from a Contingency Perspective |
title_full_unstemmed |
Entry Barriers: A Dull-, One-, or Two-Edged Sword for Incumbents? Unraveling the Paradox from a Contingency Perspective |
title_sort |
entry barriers: a dull-, one-, or two-edged sword for incumbents? unraveling the paradox from a contingency perspective |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2001 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2143 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3203402 |
_version_ |
1770570147763847168 |